2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sediment quality guideline, ERL, is not a chemical concentration at the threshold of sediment toxicity

Abstract: While it is being used as such, the sediment quality guideline ERL (Effects Range Low) is not a threshold of any chemical concentration in sediment at which the probability of toxicity shows an abrupt increase. Similarly, while it has been done, there is no basis for assuming that multiple concentrations above an ERL increase the probability of toxicity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest contents of Cr (75.3 mg/kg), Cd (0.26 mg/kg), Ni (42.5 mg/kg), Pb (56.5 mg/kg), As (20.3 mg/kg), Zn (219.2 mg/kg) and Cu (58.8 mg/ kg) in the sediments were found near the shipyard (at station 12 or 13). The contents of Ni at station 12, Zn at stations 11, 12,13 and 15, and Pb at all stations except 1, 2 and 16 exceeded the effects range low (ERL) guideline values, which are concentrations that roughly relate to low probability of sediment toxicity (MacDonald et al, 2000;O'Connor, 2004). These results suggest the risks from Ni, Zn, and Pb were elevated in the mariculture zone, particularly near the shipyard.…”
Section: Heavy Metals In Surface Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The highest contents of Cr (75.3 mg/kg), Cd (0.26 mg/kg), Ni (42.5 mg/kg), Pb (56.5 mg/kg), As (20.3 mg/kg), Zn (219.2 mg/kg) and Cu (58.8 mg/ kg) in the sediments were found near the shipyard (at station 12 or 13). The contents of Ni at station 12, Zn at stations 11, 12,13 and 15, and Pb at all stations except 1, 2 and 16 exceeded the effects range low (ERL) guideline values, which are concentrations that roughly relate to low probability of sediment toxicity (MacDonald et al, 2000;O'Connor, 2004). These results suggest the risks from Ni, Zn, and Pb were elevated in the mariculture zone, particularly near the shipyard.…”
Section: Heavy Metals In Surface Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It should be noted that while exceedances of ERL and ERM levels are statistically correlated with increasing likelihood of toxic effects, these exceedances do not in themselves indicate the presence of toxic effects (O'Connor 2004). Amphipod toxicity testing carried out as part of the NCA resulted in only 10% of LIS being rated "poor" for sediment toxicity, while 24% of LIS was rated "poor" for sediment contaminants (USEPA 2006).…”
Section: Sediment Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this classification, it is possible to distinguish three ranges of chemical concentrations: adverse effects that were observed rarely (<ERM), occasionally (values between ERL and ERM), and frequently (>ERM; McCready et al 2006). However, these values can only be used for screening approaches or in weight-ofevidence methods (Pekey et al 2004), as they are only two points on a continuum of bulk chemical concentrations in the sediments that roughly relate to sediment toxicity (O'Connor 2004).…”
Section: Index Of Geoaccumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%