1990
DOI: 10.1016/0304-405x(90)90015-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The seemingly anomalous price behavior of Royal Dutch/Shell and Unilever N.V./PLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12, No. 12;2016 co-movement is higher for US-Dutch pairs than US-UK pairs, which supports Suh (2003)'s findings that ADRs from emerging countries with fragmented markets and foreign ownership restrictions tend to trade at a higher premium to their underlying shares than those from developed countries.…”
Section: Cross-listed Stockssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12, No. 12;2016 co-movement is higher for US-Dutch pairs than US-UK pairs, which supports Suh (2003)'s findings that ADRs from emerging countries with fragmented markets and foreign ownership restrictions tend to trade at a higher premium to their underlying shares than those from developed countries.…”
Section: Cross-listed Stockssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…One of the first papers working on this topic was Rosenthal and Young (1990). They examine the pricing of shares of two Anglo-Dutch DLCs: The Royal Dutch Shell group and Unilever group for the period from September 1979 to December 1986.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Siamese Twins, as discussed in Rosenthal and Young (1990) and Froot and Dabora (1999), are firms that for historical reasons have two types of shares with fixed claims on the cash flows and assets of the firm. An example is Royal Dutch/Shell, which has both Royal Dutch shares (traded in Amsterdam) and Shell (traded in London).…”
Section: Twin Shares: Can the Stock Market Multiply By 15?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the papers in this literature investigate the differences in pricing between the ADR and the underlying share, and thus indirectly seek to explain the premium in relation to macroeconomic factors and the degree of segmentation/integration between the home and ADR market. See, for example, Rosenthal and Young (1990), Kato, Lin, and Schallheim (1991), Wahab, Lashgari, and Cohn (1992), Park and Tavokkol (1994), Miller and Morey (1996), Chakravarty, Sarkar, and Wu (1998), Foerster and Karolyi (1999), Dabora and Froot (1999), Grammig, Melvin, andSchlag (2001, 2005), Eun and Sabherwal (2002), Karolyi and Li (2003), De Jong, Rosenthal, and van Dijk (2004), Doidge, Karolyi, and Stulz (2004), Gagnon and Karolyi (2003), Suh (2003), Menkveld, Koopman, and Lucas (2003), Karolyi (2004), Bailey, Karolyi, and Salva (2005), Blouin, Hail, and Yetman (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%