1989
DOI: 10.1101/gad.3.1.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The segmentation gene Krüppel of Drosophila melanogaster has homeotic properties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3B), which is thought to represent rudimental tissues of the small intestine intermingled with rudimental Malpighian tubules. These results demonstrate that the (Harbecke and Janning, 1989;Liu and Jack, 1992;Redemann et al, 1988;Skaer, 1993). In Kr embryos, drm was found to be expressed in the posterior-most region of the midgut (Fig.…”
Section: Development Of the Small Intestine In Mutations That Affect supporting
confidence: 51%
“…3B), which is thought to represent rudimental tissues of the small intestine intermingled with rudimental Malpighian tubules. These results demonstrate that the (Harbecke and Janning, 1989;Liu and Jack, 1992;Redemann et al, 1988;Skaer, 1993). In Kr embryos, drm was found to be expressed in the posterior-most region of the midgut (Fig.…”
Section: Development Of the Small Intestine In Mutations That Affect supporting
confidence: 51%
“…2 A and B). The phenotype of Kr mutants has been described as the complete loss of renal tubule cells (15,16) and of ct mutants as the failure of specified cells to branch out from the hindgut (12,14,17). Using the transport of urates as a diagnostic feature for differentiated tubule cell function, we show that it is only when the functions of both Kr and ct are removed that cell specification fails completely (Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is clear that Kr alone is not su¤cient to dictate complete tubule cell di¡erentiation. In the absence of Kr, it is tubule eversion that fails and in mutants where Kr expression is reduced, but not lost, the tubules evert but their morphogenesis later in embryogenesis is defective (Harbecke & Janning 1989;Liu & Jack 1992).…”
Section: The Allocation Of Malpighian Tubule Cells and The Formation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is followed by the changes in cell shape that mark the onset of tubule eversion. It has been suggested that the expression of Kr alone is su¤cient to propel cells into Malpighian tubule di¡erentiation; KrÏppel acts to switch potential hindgut cells into the tubule cell fate (Harbecke & Janning 1989). Indeed, in embryos mutant for Kr no tubules bud out from the hindgut (Gloor 1950).…”
Section: The Allocation Of Malpighian Tubule Cells and The Formation mentioning
confidence: 99%