2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The seismic behaviour of precast concrete interior joints with different connection methods in assembled monolithic subway station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e main reason for larger ductility was that the opening gap of the semi-precast beam and the corbel of the column contribute to the global deformation in the later loading. A similar explanation of the above finding had also reported by Liu et al [23].…”
Section: Hysteretic Response and Envelopessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…e main reason for larger ductility was that the opening gap of the semi-precast beam and the corbel of the column contribute to the global deformation in the later loading. A similar explanation of the above finding had also reported by Liu et al [23].…”
Section: Hysteretic Response and Envelopessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In terms of the failure mode, two reference specimens failed in different ways [23,36], as shown in Figure 6. Compared with the cast-in-place specimen, the following observation was realized.…”
Section: Overview Of Failure Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stiffness degradation under loading can represent the accumulation of internal structural damage and the structural capacity to resist deformation, which can be used to evaluate the mechanical behaviour of a structural member and aid in the design and modelling of a structural subassembly 10 [50][51][52][53][54]. The initial stiffness 𝐾 1 , secondary stiffness 𝐾 2 , and third equivalent stiffness 𝐾 3 can be calculated based on the characteristic parameters obtained from Tables 5 and 6, which can be described as follows:…”
Section: Evolution Of Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work has been performed on the mechanical properties of precast concrete beam-column joints. Liu et al [ 29 ] studied different connecting methods for the precast beam-column joints and compared the seismic behavior of a precast joint with a cast-in-place one, the result showed that the precast joint was capable of matching performance in terms of peaking strength, stiffness, deformation performance of the cast-in-place connections, but the failure cracks of the precast specimen always concentrated in the junction between precast elements and post-pouring concrete. Feng et al [ 30 ] studied the effects of post-cast connections on seismic performance of precast concrete frame joints and suggested that the location of the connection should be at a plastic hinge length away from the beam end; the distance was proposed as 2 h. Zhang et al [ 31 ] proposed a new kind of precast composite beam-column joints without concrete cast in place in the core area, which consisted of a precast column with a built-in steel skeleton, a precast beam with a built-in H-steel beam, and connecting parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%