2005
DOI: 10.1177/0886368705276185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Selection of Competing Third Party Administrators

Abstract: Quantitative analysis can be used to avoid subjective criteria in making a final selection decision.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other factors for company selection include location, infrastructure, speed and quality of services provided, internet banking facilities, staff professionalism and guidance, and the firm's reputation [ 9 ]. The number of providers in the network, network discounts that would affect expected claims, fixed administration costs and aggregate reinsurance trigger are factors that the employers believed were significant in selecting between competing CHICs [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Other factors for company selection include location, infrastructure, speed and quality of services provided, internet banking facilities, staff professionalism and guidance, and the firm's reputation [ 9 ]. The number of providers in the network, network discounts that would affect expected claims, fixed administration costs and aggregate reinsurance trigger are factors that the employers believed were significant in selecting between competing CHICs [ 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all organisations, expenses related to the employee health benefits packages are rising, mainly due to increased health care services utilisation [ 6 ]. Hence, organisations are looking for complementary health financing arrangements to provide more financial protection for employees against medical care expenditure [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations