1961
DOI: 10.1210/endo-69-4-819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Selective Testicular Effects of Certain Bis-(Dichloroacetyl) Diamines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full recovery to normal seminiferous tubule diameters was attained after 42 days of WIN treatment followed by 42 days of withdrawal. These ndings conform to the seminiferous tubule diameter reductions in the rat (Beyler et al 1961, Heller et al 1961, Drobeck & Coulston 1962, Kar et al 1966 and in the mouse (Singh & Dominic 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Full recovery to normal seminiferous tubule diameters was attained after 42 days of WIN treatment followed by 42 days of withdrawal. These ndings conform to the seminiferous tubule diameter reductions in the rat (Beyler et al 1961, Heller et al 1961, Drobeck & Coulston 1962, Kar et al 1966 and in the mouse (Singh & Dominic 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Over fifty years ago, the oral administration of WIN 18,446 was shown to completely and reversibly inhibit spermatogenesis in man (7476). Unfortunately, subjects taking WIN 18,446 experienced a “disulfiram reaction” consisting of nausea, vomiting, palpitations and sweating, when they took WIN 18,446 and drank alcohol.…”
Section: Experimental Male Contraceptivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This compound was initially being developed as an amebicide (Berberian et al, 1961), but was noted to cause marked impairment of spermatogenesis in rodents, without significant effects on other tissues (Coulston et al, 1960). Follow‐up investigations in dogs and rhesus monkeys demonstrated that oral administration of WIN 18,446 led to a complete arrest of spermatogenesis in testicular biopsies (Beyler et al, 1961; Heller et al, 1963). Notably, WIN 18,446 had no effect on serum testosterone concentrations, implying that the mechanism by which WIN 18,446 suppressed spermatogenesis was not hormonal in nature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%