The Self-Perception Connection: Why Consumers Devalue Unattractive Produce

Abstract

This research investigates the mechanism by which the aesthetic premium placed on produce contributes to consumers’ rejection of safe, edible, yet aesthetically unattractive, fruits and vegetables, which results in both financial loss to retailers and food waste. Further, the authors identify a novel way in which the devaluation of such produce can be reduced. Five experiments demonstrate that consumers devalue unattractive produce because of altered self-perceptions: merely imagining the consumption of unattractive produce negatively affects how consumers view themselves, lowering their willingness to pay for unattractive produce relative to equivalently safe but more attractive alternatives. This discrepancy in willingness to pay for unattractive versus attractive produce can be reduced by altering the self-diagnostic signal of consumer choices and boosting consumers’ self-esteem. An experiment in the field demonstrates the effectiveness of using easily implementable in-store messaging to boost consumers’ self-esteem in ways that increase consumers’ positive self-perceptions and, subsequently, their willingness to choose unattractive produce. This research, therefore, suggests low-cost yet effective strategies retailers can use to market unattractive produce, potentially raising retailer profits while reducing food waste.

Packaging design elements and consumers' decision to buy from the Web: A cause and effect decision‐making model

“…Product graphics typically consist of the general layout, colour combination, typography, and product photography . The characteristics of a packages' graphical design has the potential to appeal to the consumer's aesthetic sense and arouse their interest in a product, in addition to increasing the probability of a purchase . Graphics provide a simpler means for an individual to evaluate product alternatives, especially for low‐involvement customers .…”

“…4 The characteristics of a packages' graphical design has the potential to appeal to the consumer's aesthetic sense and arouse their interest in a product, in addition to increasing the probability of a purchase. 33 Graphics provide a simpler means for an individual to evaluate product alternatives, especially for lowinvolvement customers. 18 Using high-quality graphics can potentially attract the attention of consumers, 20 communicate an image of quality to consumers, 34 and generate a significant amount of impulse buying behaviors from consumers.…”

Truly Sustainability or Hypocrisy: The Effects of Corporate Sustainable Orientation on Consumers’ Quality Perception and Trust Based on Evidence from China

“…Then, real consumers were invited to participate in the survey. Because it is to measure the attitudes of consumers toward different situations, the grouping method can be better implemented, which has also been confirmed in other relevant studies [98,99]. In the formal survey, we conduct a 2 (sustainable value: Perfect duty vs. imperfect duty) × 2 (sustainable goals: Clear vs. unclear) + 2 (sustainable structure: Well-defined vs. not-well-defined) between-subject design.…”

Scarce Foods are Perceived as Having More Calories

“…For instance, recent research shows that the perceived value of a food changes as a function of its aesthetics. Specifically, consumers devalue “ugly” foods (e.g., misshaped produce) because the prospect of consuming such foods makes them feel bad about themselves (Grewal, Hmurovic, Lamberton, & Reczek, ). This suggests that a scarce food and its influence on resource deprivation and calorie estimates may be exacerbated (attenuated) when the food is aesthetically pleasant (unpleasant).…”