2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-01400-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The self’s choice: Priming attentional focus on bodily self promotes loss frequency bias

Abstract: When attention is focused on self representation(s), the ability to evaluate one’s internal sensations is enhanced, according to previous research by Ainley and colleagues (Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1231–1238, 2013). Self-representations are usually distinguished between bodily and narrative. Both bodily and narrative representations improve decision-making processes, in that the consideration of alternatives is informed by sensations experienced deep inside the body (e.g., anxiety) as suggest by the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Self discrepancy theory and related studies the self is a malleable, dynamic and multiple construct (Markus, 1977;Higgins et al, 1985;Markus and Kunda, 1986), multiple self-representations coexist (e.g., ideal self, actual self, ought self, good and bad self) and can be activated to guide behaviors at any particular moment due to a number of factors that make them salient in a social situation. Discrepancy between selves, as well as lack of integration in one self-representation, have been consistently linked to mental and physical health issues (Higgins et al, 1985;Mason et al, 2019;Triberti et al, 2019;Sebri et al, 2021a). The experience of chronic illness can affect the perception on both bodily and narrative self-representations Specifically, oncological treatments can alter patients' self-concept as they experience consequences (or effects) of treatments (such as hair loss, sexual disturbances or breast removal) (Clemmey and Nicassio, 1997;Sebri et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Injured Self In Breast Cancer Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Self discrepancy theory and related studies the self is a malleable, dynamic and multiple construct (Markus, 1977;Higgins et al, 1985;Markus and Kunda, 1986), multiple self-representations coexist (e.g., ideal self, actual self, ought self, good and bad self) and can be activated to guide behaviors at any particular moment due to a number of factors that make them salient in a social situation. Discrepancy between selves, as well as lack of integration in one self-representation, have been consistently linked to mental and physical health issues (Higgins et al, 1985;Mason et al, 2019;Triberti et al, 2019;Sebri et al, 2021a). The experience of chronic illness can affect the perception on both bodily and narrative self-representations Specifically, oncological treatments can alter patients' self-concept as they experience consequences (or effects) of treatments (such as hair loss, sexual disturbances or breast removal) (Clemmey and Nicassio, 1997;Sebri et al, 2021b).…”
Section: Injured Self In Breast Cancer Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the background, women with a history of breast cancer tend to reframe their identity as that of a or “woman at risk,” leading to rethinking future expectations and taking health management into account (Gibson et al, 2015 ; McGannon et al, 2016 ; Moskalewicz et al, 2022 ). In this way, women need to deal with a renovated overall self, which is described as a system of cognitive and affective schemas that affects life-meanings and decisions (Christoff et al, 2011 ; Sui and Humphreys, 2015 ; Sebri et al, 2021c ). Women tend to show a new self-representation, called Injured Self , an illness-schema rich with emotions and autobiographical memories related to the oncological journey, which is particularly relevant to create images of the self (Sebri et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Body Sexuality and Intimate Relationships After Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their studies, they found that subjects who show higher anxiety levels tended to make riskaverse personal choices, but not in others' decisions. According to literature, anxiety affects decision because its makes risks and possible negative outcomes of choices more salient in the decision maker's perception (Sebri et al, 2021;Noël et al, 2013;Cavanagh et al, 2014;Herman et al, 2018), so that final decisions may be conservative and/or orientated to avoid risks and punishments more than obtaining distant positive outcomes.…”
Section: The Role Of Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%