2013
DOI: 10.2140/apde.2013.6.1649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The semiclassical limit of the time dependent Hartree–Fock equation: The Weyl symbol of the solution

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
100
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the second result (Theorem 2.1) is a continuation of our work in [1], where the Weyl symbol was considered instead of the Wick symbol. The work in [1] is devoted to the the Weyl symbol of a solution ρ h (t) to the TDHF equation, under the hypothesis that ρ h (0) is a PDO trace class operator belonging to the class studied by Rondeaux [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the second result (Theorem 2.1) is a continuation of our work in [1], where the Weyl symbol was considered instead of the Wick symbol. The work in [1] is devoted to the the Weyl symbol of a solution ρ h (t) to the TDHF equation, under the hypothesis that ρ h (0) is a PDO trace class operator belonging to the class studied by Rondeaux [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Since we are concerned with trace class operators it makes sense that the norm involve to estimate the difference u h (., t)−v h (., t) is the L 1 (IR 2n ) norm. A first answer to this issue is given in [1] where we assume that the operator ρ h (0) is a PDO operator belonging to the Rondeaux class [14] (with a modification to take into account the parameter h). The article [1] also gives an asymptotic expansion at any order of u h (., t)−v h (., t).…”
Section: Statement Of the Second Result: The Case Of Trace Class Opermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations