2020
DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sensitivity of network statistics to incomplete electrode sampling on intracranial EEG

Abstract: Network neuroscience applied to epilepsy holds promise to map pathological networks, localize seizure generators, and inform targeted interventions to control seizures. However, incomplete sampling of the epileptic brain because of sparse placement of intracranial electrodes may affect model results. In this study, we evaluate the sensitivity of several published network measures to incomplete spatial sampling and propose an algorithm using network subsampling to determine confidence in model results. We retro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This flexibility, although proven advantageous, hinders our ability to generalize neuronal network findings. Indeed, the topology is sensitive to different spatial parcellations as well as the density of the sampling approach (Bonzanni et al, 2020; Conrad et al, 2020; Giacopelli et al, 2020); which means that the network descriptors change based on the spatial granulation chosen, preventing the comparison of network data using different recording methods. Because the activity of nodes in higher spatial granulations (a cluster of neurons at mesoscale) originates from the activity of lower‐level nodes (single neurons at microscale), the following question naturally arose: given the same functional network represented at microscale and mesoscale, is the microscale topology conserved at mesoscale?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This flexibility, although proven advantageous, hinders our ability to generalize neuronal network findings. Indeed, the topology is sensitive to different spatial parcellations as well as the density of the sampling approach (Bonzanni et al, 2020; Conrad et al, 2020; Giacopelli et al, 2020); which means that the network descriptors change based on the spatial granulation chosen, preventing the comparison of network data using different recording methods. Because the activity of nodes in higher spatial granulations (a cluster of neurons at mesoscale) originates from the activity of lower‐level nodes (single neurons at microscale), the following question naturally arose: given the same functional network represented at microscale and mesoscale, is the microscale topology conserved at mesoscale?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronizability ( Sync ) quantifies the stability of the fully synchronous network state (Conrad et al, 2020). It is computed as follows: italicSync=λ2λitalicmax0.25em where λ 2 is the second smallest eigenvalue of the weighted Laplacian matrix (computed as the difference between the node strength matrix D and the adjacent matrix) and λ max is the largest eigenvalue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given that node strength is among the least sensitive network metrics to sampling bias 22 , we felt that it was a reasonable choice to compare these approaches. Another key limitation is that we could not balance SEEG and ECoG groups for surgical type due to clinical practice at our center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is that while the graph metric we chose for localization, node strength, is frequently studied in patients with epilepsy, other metrics and models might have revealed a different relationship between findings in ECoG and SEEG. However, given that node strength is among the least sensitive network metrics to sampling bias 22 , we felt that it was a reasonable choice to compare these approaches. Another key limitation is that we could not balance SEEG and ECoG groups for surgical type due to clinical practice at our center.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wrote custom MATLAB scripts to create null distributions for our energy analysis by randomly sampling with replacement 5,000 sets of nodes containing the same number of nodes as our set of interest. Our random resampling method is an extension of similar methods used to compute subject-specific confidence intervals for nodal metric values ( 52 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%