The increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions into the atmosphere are heavily affecting the global climate and at the same time are acidifying the oceans (IPCC, 2019). In particular, the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), the most important greenhouse gas (GHG) by radiative forcing, is significantly and continuously rising due to human activities such as the use of fossil fuels and ongoing deforestation (Friedlingstein et al., 2020). Further greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and consequent warming are expected in the coming decades (IPCC, 2021). Rapid and far-reaching transitions in energy, land, urban infrastructure and industrial systems are then urgently needed to decrease the emissions in order to limit global warming (IPCC, 2018). Furthermore, in order to keep the increase of global temperature well below 2°C, as agreed with Article 2 of the Paris agreement, different approaches to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration in the atmosphere through so-called "negative emission technologies" (NETs) have been proposed, such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, afforestation and reforestation, land management to increase carbon in soils, enhanced weathering, direct carbon storage, ocean fertilization, and ocean alkalinization (EASAC, 2018;Minx et al., 2018). A portfolio of negative emission technologies (NETs) is needed to provide many Gt yr −1 of carbon removal, and as a consequence, the comparison of the different pros and cons, co-benefits and side effects of the different options is a developing