1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2364(79)90019-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sensitivity of the zeugmatographic experiment involving human samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
511
1
10

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 562 publications
(540 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
18
511
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, unlike conventional MRI, the strong field is not needed here to polarize the gas. Futhermore, if experimental noise is dominated by electrical losses in the body it scales linearly with frequency [7], and because the inductive NMR signal does so as well, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is independent of field and there exists no benefit to performing HG imaging at high fields in that respect. This was confirmed at 0.1 T by the research group at Orsay using a Sopha-imaging-Magnetech MRI unit [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike conventional MRI, the strong field is not needed here to polarize the gas. Futhermore, if experimental noise is dominated by electrical losses in the body it scales linearly with frequency [7], and because the inductive NMR signal does so as well, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is independent of field and there exists no benefit to performing HG imaging at high fields in that respect. This was confirmed at 0.1 T by the research group at Orsay using a Sopha-imaging-Magnetech MRI unit [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When imaging even earlier-stage embryos than we have considered here (i.e., E9.5-E13.5), the sample noise decreases more rapidly than the coil noise with respect to dimensional size: the sample noise variance scales with dimension to the fifth power, whereas the coil noise variance scales with the square of dimension (14). This will result in MR image noise dominated by coil noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…If one were to perform mouse embryo imaging at higher field strength (which would be recommended to increase the SNR), since the sample resistance is proportional to the square of field strength, whereas the coil resistance is proportional to the square root of field strength (14), MR image noise will return to the sample-noise-dominated regimen, as is the case for clinical MRI at 1.5-3 T. This will result in the SNR being proportional to the field strength for both the shared and individual methods. Therefore, at a given field strength, the SNR ratio between these two methods will no longer be dependent on the field strength and will be higher than the SNR ratio at lower field strength, as determined in this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spatially dependent SNR of parallel single-shot DW EPI in combination with SE and STE acquisition, respectively, is given as (11,20,21):…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%