2014
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The separate effects of egg size and parental quality on the development of ornamental plumage coloration

Abstract: The fitness‐related consequences of egg size, independent of the influences of parental quality, are poorly understood in altricial birds. Not only can egg size and parental quality influence growth and survival, but each could influence the development of condition‐dependent plumage coloration in offspring. The Eastern Bluebird Sialia sialis is an altricial, multi‐brooded, cavity‐nesting passerine in which juveniles display dichromatic UV‐blue plumage. Previous research suggests that plumage coloration acts a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…García-Navas and José Sanz 2011; Jacquin et al 2012;Robinson et al 2014). Parental quality also affects fitness traits, such as nestling survival (Voltura et al 2002;Sasvari et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…García-Navas and José Sanz 2011; Jacquin et al 2012;Robinson et al 2014). Parental quality also affects fitness traits, such as nestling survival (Voltura et al 2002;Sasvari et al 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know whether uni-parental broods were caused by a predation or a desertion. However, the lack of differences in egg masses and brood sizes between uni-parental and bi-parental nests indicates similar condition of adults, as above features have the potential to re-flect quality of parent birds (Slagsvold & Lifjeld 1990, Rish & Rohwer 2000, Silva et al 2007, Robinson et al 2014. It should also be noted that we did not control for the prey size delivered by single parents and pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%