1957
DOI: 10.1177/003693305700200603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Serological Diagnosis of Influenza in Infancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1970
1970

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under 6 months of age isolation of B. pertussis was much conmnoner than positive serological findings; over 1 year of age serological tests were more often positive than were cultures. Our study suggests that two agerelated factors were involved in this difference-namely, a poor or delayed antibody response by the young infant as has been previously reported in other respiratory infections (Grist, 1957;Chanock et al, 1961;Ross et al, 1964) and the low proportion of children under 6 months of age who had been fully immunized against B. pertussis. In some children previous immunization appeared to have suppressed growth of B. pertussis in the nasopharynx but not the serological response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Under 6 months of age isolation of B. pertussis was much conmnoner than positive serological findings; over 1 year of age serological tests were more often positive than were cultures. Our study suggests that two agerelated factors were involved in this difference-namely, a poor or delayed antibody response by the young infant as has been previously reported in other respiratory infections (Grist, 1957;Chanock et al, 1961;Ross et al, 1964) and the low proportion of children under 6 months of age who had been fully immunized against B. pertussis. In some children previous immunization appeared to have suppressed growth of B. pertussis in the nasopharynx but not the serological response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Whatever the final explanation may prove to be, the demonstration that differences can be measured serologically in the nucleoproteins isolated from several strains of type A influenza virus is believed to be a unique and important finding. Grist's observation (30) that an element of strain specificity is demonstrable when soluble antigens prepared from infected egg membranes are used to test the acute and convalescent sera of infants, support the interpretation offered. Asian AA/~ vaccination against influenza, and because Schiifer (17) has shown that the hemagglutinin isolated from KP virus induced immunity when used as a vaccine, it was of special interest to test the capacity of these viruses and their corresponding hemagglutinins to induce antibody by vaccination.…”
Section: Other Biologic Activities Of Preparations Of Influenza Subunmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, if the child's clinical illness is prolonged and no routine positive virological findings have been found, the meningococcal CF test is worth consideration. It would seem that even in infants the CF antibody response to meningococcal infection is good; this contrasts with the absence or slow development in young children of CF antibodies in response to many viral infections (Anderson, Donnelly, French, Kalra & White, 1953;Grist, 1957).…”
Section: Group 1: Proven Meningococcalmentioning
confidence: 95%