The Sesto Fiorentino Study: Point and One-Year Prevalences of Psychiatric Disorders in an Italian Community Sample Using Clinical Interviewers

Abstract

Background: It has been argued that lay interviewers’ use of fully-structured interviews could lead to a diagnostic pattern different to that by treating physicians. Clinical interviewers in community samples should probably identify cases that are closer to those seen in clinical settings. The greatest advantage of using clinical interviewers consists of the immediate assessment of a possible psychopathology, i.e. the evaluation of current disorders. Methods: Two thousand three hundred and sixty-three citizens from the community of Sesto Fiorentino, Italy, were interviewed by their own general practitioners using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Positive cases for any lifetime psychiatric disorder as well as a random sample of the negative cases were re-interviewed by psychiatrists or trained residents in psychiatry using the Florence Psychiatric Interview (FPI). Results: The point prevalence for any current disorder was 8.7%; the two disorders with the highest prevalence were generalised anxiety disorder (2.9%) and major depressive episode (2.7%). The figures increase about 50% when the sub-threshold sequelae of previous disorders are considered. Current comorbidity was generally high. The one-year prevalence of any disorder was 10.6%. Ninety-two percent of the cases sought help, 82% were being treated at the moment of interview. Social impairment was considerable. Conclusions: The period prevalence rates for most of the disorders considered were generally comparable with the range defined by previous studies conducted in other Western countries, despite using different methodologies. Conversely, the use of health facilities, the treatment received and the social impairment were much higher than those reported by the other studies, suggesting a greater similarity with the clinical samples.

Prevalence and correlates of mental disorders among adolescents in Italy: the PrISMA study

“…However, in contrast with findings from other studies [3,12,14,19,21,44,46] that reported prevalence estimates of externalizing disorders of 4-7%, the percentage of Italian adolescents with these disorders was only 1.2%. These data are consistent with findings on Italian adults [15,18,28]. In particular, the recent ESEMeD-WMH study [15] indicates that compared to other European countries and Figures in boldface reflect statistically significant differences the US, in Italy the prevalence rates of anxiety (5.8% CI 4.5-7.1%) and mood disorders (3.8% CI 3.1-4.5%) are lower and those of impulse control (0.3% 95% CI 0.1-0.5) and substance use (0.1% 95% CI 0-0.2) disorders are the lowest.…”

Diagnostic validity of comorbid bipolar disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder: a systematic review

“…Three populationbased studies conducted in Italy and USA, reported lifetime prevalence rates of comorbid OCD in BD patients ranging between 11.1% and 21% (3,23,24). In hospital-based studies, the lifetime prevalence of comorbid OCD in BD patients ranged between 1.8% and 35.1% (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40) depending on the features of the BD study population included (schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type).…”

Clinical and familial profile of bipolar disorder with and without obsessive-compulsive disorder: an Indian study

“…Population-based studies reported lifetime prevalence rates of comorbid BD-OCD ranging between 11.1 and 21%. [1][2][3] The prevalence of OCD may be masked by presence of manic or depressive symptoms in BD, which is evident from data in remitted patients where the reported prevalence of comorbid OCD is quite high (35 to 38.6%). [4][5][6] In children with BD, the prevalence of OCD ranges between 20.7 and 46.9%.…”