2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The setting of non-financial goals in the family firm: The influence of family climate and identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
64
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Are the negative effects of family ownership stressed by the negative influence of professional management, such as being less able to benefit from altruism, short-term perspectives, or conflicts of interest, among others? Moreover, because family businesses have economic and non-economic goals (Astrachan, 2010;Cabrera-Suá rez, Dé niz-Dé niz, & Martín-Santana, 2014;Chrisman, Chua, Pearson, & Barnett, 2012;Deephouse & Jaskiewicz, 2013;, the variables should not only refer to financial returns -as shown in the present study -but also consider the level of underlying vision, attitudes, and intentions of the controlling family (Gomez-Mejia, Haynes, Nú ñ ez-Nickel, Jacobson, & Moyano-Fuentes, 2007) or even the degree of identification family members have with the firm (Cabrera-Suá rez et al, 2014). Other limitations to consider may include a systematic bias regarding family firms with dispersed ownership and professional management, which have been excluded from our analysis due to the lack of firms that present these features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Are the negative effects of family ownership stressed by the negative influence of professional management, such as being less able to benefit from altruism, short-term perspectives, or conflicts of interest, among others? Moreover, because family businesses have economic and non-economic goals (Astrachan, 2010;Cabrera-Suá rez, Dé niz-Dé niz, & Martín-Santana, 2014;Chrisman, Chua, Pearson, & Barnett, 2012;Deephouse & Jaskiewicz, 2013;, the variables should not only refer to financial returns -as shown in the present study -but also consider the level of underlying vision, attitudes, and intentions of the controlling family (Gomez-Mejia, Haynes, Nú ñ ez-Nickel, Jacobson, & Moyano-Fuentes, 2007) or even the degree of identification family members have with the firm (Cabrera-Suá rez et al, 2014). Other limitations to consider may include a systematic bias regarding family firms with dispersed ownership and professional management, which have been excluded from our analysis due to the lack of firms that present these features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas founder and family ownerships reduce the number of CSR concerns, the management dimension of family and founder firms goes in the opposite direction: The presence of family and founder CEOs in firms is associated with more CSR concerns. Cabrera‐Suárez, Déniz‐Déniz, and Martín‐Santana () identified two types of firms based on family participation: high family involvement (at least 50% of governance and management positions are held by family members) and low family involvement. This research shows that there is a different profile for the high involvement firms compared with the low‐involvement firms.…”
Section: Sustainable Determinants In Ffs: Evidence From the Analyzed mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategic logic of controlling owner-managers requires an examination of their cognition and perception, such as their attention (Ocasio & Joseph, 2017) and prioritization of economic and non-economic foci (Chrisman, Chua, Pearson, & Barnett, 2012). These elements can be captured through laboratory experiments on individuals' cognitive responses (Welpe, Spörrle, Grichnik, Michl, & Audretsch, 2012), survey questions about corporate goals (Cabrera-Suárez, Déniz-Déniz, & Martín-Santana, 2014;Chrisman et al, 2012), or the content analysis of corporate reports (Ocasio & Joseph, 2017). Regarding firm-level network constructs, future empirical studies could follow Mani and Durand's (in press) constructs of clustering, bridging, and embeddedness (Borgatti & Halgin, 2011).…”
Section: -------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%