1982
DOI: 10.1016/0160-2527(82)90033-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The sex offender: Lessons from the California experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1944, California replaced its sexual psychopath law with an alternative sentence known as the Mentally Disordered Sex Offender (MDSO) law (Monahan & Davis, 1983; Oliver, 1982; Steadman et al, 1982). Individuals who met the criteria and agreed to treatment were treated at a secure psychiatric hospital.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Sex Offender Civil Commitment (Socc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1944, California replaced its sexual psychopath law with an alternative sentence known as the Mentally Disordered Sex Offender (MDSO) law (Monahan & Davis, 1983; Oliver, 1982; Steadman et al, 1982). Individuals who met the criteria and agreed to treatment were treated at a secure psychiatric hospital.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Sex Offender Civil Commitment (Socc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En citant des recherches montrant la grande imprécision des évaluations de dangerosité et la faible efficacité des traitements pour les personnes incarcérées en vertu des lois sur la psychopathie sexuelle, les défenseurs des libertés individuelles ont réussi à faire abolir ces dernières lois et à mettre fin à l'internement indéter-miné et au traitement involontaire. A travers les États-Unis, on s'éloigna des lois sur la psychopathie sexuelle et, plus généralement, des sentences indéterminées (Serril, 1977c;McGee, 1978 (Oliver, 1982). En 1981, l'État de Washington a adopté sa loi Sentencing Reform Act, qui, en se basant sur une combinaison des condamnations courantes et passées, établissait un éventail standard de sentences pour tous les crimes.…”
Section: Le Modèle Juridique : La Démystification De La Dangerositéunclassified
“…The assessment of the dangerous sexual offender, often within the parameters of special legislation, is one such example. Anthony Oliver [9], persuasively argues that such legislation is a misuse of psychiatry for purposes of social control and that it 'represents the gravest risk to our scientific and moral status'. Not infrequently, legislation of this nature requires one or more medical practitioner or psychiatrist who is prepared to state that the individual is unable to control his or her sexual instincts.…”
Section: Ethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%