2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-009-9221-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shadow of death: analysing the pre-exit productivity of Portuguese manufacturing firms

Abstract: Exit pattern, Firm survival, Portugal, Pre-exit performance, Productivity, D24, D21, L25, L26, L60,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their preceding study, however, Haynes et al (2000) failed to detect this effect. Moreover, Carreira and Teixeira (2009) generally confirm that market selection forces low-productivity firms to exit, but there is also non-negligible share of low-productivity firms that stay and high-productivity firms that exit. Thus, based on the models of Hopenhayn et al (1992) and Helpman et al (2004), we assume 8 that high-productivity French firms have a significantly higher propensity to invest abroad and to continue producing abroad than low-productivity firms.…”
Section: Firm Productivitymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In their preceding study, however, Haynes et al (2000) failed to detect this effect. Moreover, Carreira and Teixeira (2009) generally confirm that market selection forces low-productivity firms to exit, but there is also non-negligible share of low-productivity firms that stay and high-productivity firms that exit. Thus, based on the models of Hopenhayn et al (1992) and Helpman et al (2004), we assume 8 that high-productivity French firms have a significantly higher propensity to invest abroad and to continue producing abroad than low-productivity firms.…”
Section: Firm Productivitymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Also, we expect low real interest rates to discourage firm exit (Kendall et al, 2010). These effects are particularly important for small firms, which are generally more likely to exit due to cost disadvantages that make them less able to compete efficiently and survive (Fotopoulos and Spence, 1998;Esteve et al, 2004;Box, 2008;Carreira and Teixeira, 2011). Thus, the "liability of smallness" means that exits should be higher in regions with a large proportion of small firms.…”
Section: Firm Exit In Developed Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the firm-level, we control for firm age (see Jovanovic, 1982;Stinchcombe, 1965, among others), firm size (measured by the log number of employees) (e.g., Varum & Rocha, 2012), human capital (proxied by the share of college workers) (e.g., Acs & Armington, 2009;Bates, 1990), firm performance (sales per worker, in logs) (e.g., Bandick, 2010;Carreira & Teixeira, 2011) and location in urban centers (e.g., Fotopoulos & Louri, 2000). The effects of firm age and size are allowed to be non-linear in line with most of the literature, as these variables may exert an increasing (decreasing) effect on firm exit risks up to some point of firm age or size, while exerting a decreasing (increasing) effect thereafter.…”
Section: Empirical Strategy and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%