2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10914-019-09466-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Shape of Sound: a Geometric Morphometrics Approach to Laryngeal Functional Morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One hundred surface landmarks were acquired from the thyroid and cricoid cartilages, and 50 from the arytenoid cartilage and the epiglottis to achieve comprehensive coverage. We established the optimal number of landmarks for each cartilage previously (Borgard et al, 2019).…”
Section: Landmark Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…One hundred surface landmarks were acquired from the thyroid and cricoid cartilages, and 50 from the arytenoid cartilage and the epiglottis to achieve comprehensive coverage. We established the optimal number of landmarks for each cartilage previously (Borgard et al, 2019).…”
Section: Landmark Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cricoid cartilage generally shows less variation within and between species, and there was minimal distinction in shape across developmental stages. For example, we previously used the same geometric morphometric approach to demonstrate that the cricoid cartilage showed the least shape differences between five rodent species of all the laryngeal cartilages (Borgard et al, 2019). For the human larynx, we know that there are important age-specific shape characteristics in the pediatric, juvenile, and adult organ (e.g., Eckel et al, 1994Eckel et al, , 1999Kahane, 1982), but Table 3.…”
Section: Negative Allometric Growth Of Larynx and Laryngeal Airwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In comparative anatomy, Micro-CT scanning is now part of the standard non-destructive analytical toolkit, creating data for use in analyses such as geometric morphometrics (GMM) and finite element analysis (FEA) (Borgard et al, 2019;Brassey et al, 2018Brassey et al, , 2013Brocklehurst et al, 2019;Cuff et al, 2015;Marshall et al, 2019;Polly et al, 2016). Unfortunately for researchers, if one wishes to quantify biological structures, the data does not simply appear from scanners ready to use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%