2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2006.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shape of the cohesive arch in hoppers and silos — Some theoretical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In their case the arches presumably form between grounded pressure ridges (in the East Siberian Sea), but the principle is the same as when the arches form between islands, as discussed elsewhere in this text. For an arch forming in a converging channel the strength of the structure is equal to the uniaxial compressive strength [ Matchett , ; Jenike , ]. This may not hold here since the arches are not forming in regular, converging channels, but between irregularly spaced pressure ridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their case the arches presumably form between grounded pressure ridges (in the East Siberian Sea), but the principle is the same as when the arches form between islands, as discussed elsewhere in this text. For an arch forming in a converging channel the strength of the structure is equal to the uniaxial compressive strength [ Matchett , ; Jenike , ]. This may not hold here since the arches are not forming in regular, converging channels, but between irregularly spaced pressure ridges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a common practice to use the Rankine equation (Eq. (15)) in routine design applications in the authors' experiences as well as in research works [13][14][15][16] to compute the normal stresses on walls, without considering the effect of slope of the walls and appropriate shearing resistance adjacent to the walls. The application of the Rankine equation gives realistic values of active stress coefficient for storage vessels with smooth vertical walls only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambiental, v.17, n.3, p.339-345, 2013. Matchett (2007) concluiu que, apesar de diversas teorias de formação de arcos coesivos, como as de Jenike (1964), Enstad (1981) e Walker (1966) previrem a obstrução na forma de arcos circulares e, ainda, terem boa aproximação quando comparadas a situações reais, isto não significa que a hipótese de arco circular é válida para qualquer situação de descarga, pelo fato de não haver, ainda, informações experimentais das tensões no produto localizado próximo ao orifício de descarga.…”
Section: Cunclassified