2013
DOI: 10.19030/jabr.v30i1.8304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Shift-Contagion Effect Of Global Financial Crisis And The European Sovereign Debt Crisis On OECD Countries

Abstract: <p>This article investigates shift-contagion as defined by Forbes and Rigobon (2002) in 16 OECD member economies during most recent financial crisis i.e. global financial crisis (2008-2009) and European sovereign debt crisis (2009-2012), using multivariate asymmetric dynamic conditional correlation model developed by Cappiello et al. (2006). The empirical analyses provide substantial evidence of shifts in the dynamic correlations and hence reconfirm shift-contagion during the global financial crisis that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, increased financial flows, particularly FDI and portfolio flows, have also been shown to raise income inequality in both advanced and emerging market economies (Basu & Guariglia, 2007). In addition to these papers, other studies of scholars like Kazi, Mehanaoui, and Akbar (2014) and Guesmi, Kaabia, and Irfan (2013) have documented the substantial importance of financial exposures across OECD countries.…”
Section: Connectedness and Rationale For Multi‐dimensional Oecd Weighmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, increased financial flows, particularly FDI and portfolio flows, have also been shown to raise income inequality in both advanced and emerging market economies (Basu & Guariglia, 2007). In addition to these papers, other studies of scholars like Kazi, Mehanaoui, and Akbar (2014) and Guesmi, Kaabia, and Irfan (2013) have documented the substantial importance of financial exposures across OECD countries.…”
Section: Connectedness and Rationale For Multi‐dimensional Oecd Weighmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…See, De Paula, Hotta & Zevallos (2008), Bonga-Bonga (2018),Kazi, Mehanaoui & Akbar (2014),Hassan et al (2017), Huang, Huang & Wang (2019 and others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%