The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Kim, Say-June; Ryu, Gil-O; Choi, Byung Jo; Kim, Jeong-Goo; Lee, Kwan-Ju; Lee, Sang Chul; Oh, Seong-Taek

doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318237826b

Cited by 155 publications

(99 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Kim et al [3] showed that postoperative recovery was faster in the SILC group in terms of shorter time duration before first flatus (SILC vs CLC; 2.5 ± 1.2 d vs 3.2 ± 1.8 d, P = 0.004), earlier initiation of free oral fluids (1.8 ± 2.2 d vs 2.6 ± 1.7 d, P = 0.000) and of a solid diet (4.2 ± 2.9 d vs 6.5 ± 2.7 d, P = 0.000), less frequent usage of parenteral narcotics (2.2 ± 3.2 times vs 3.5 ± 4.0 times, P = 0.029), and shorter hospital stay (9.6 ± 9.6 d vs 15.5 ± 9.8 d, P = 0.000) ( Table 3). With regard to oncologic clearance, 14 studies reported average lymph node harvest.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Hirano

Hattori

Douden

et al. 2016

WJGS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The literature search identified one randomized contro lled trial and 13 cased-matched control or comparative studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . In total, 1559 colorectal resections were included, 589 by SILC and 970 by CLC.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Hirano

Hattori

Douden

et al. 2016

WJGS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Single incision gastrectomy for gastric cancer or matched retrospective study, even though the number of sample size was limited (11)(12)(13)(14).…”

Section: Review Articlementioning

confidence: 99%

Single incision gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Suh

Lee

Yang

2016

Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on rapid development of laparoscopic techniques and instruments, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is expected to be the next step of "more" minimally invasive surgery. A few institutions gradually started to report their experience of single incision gastrectomy (SIG) for gastric cancer, but it is still difficult to accept that SIG can be performed as a popular procedure because of its technical difficulty. For wide adoption of SIG, the simplicity, safety and reproducibility of not only lymph node dissection but also reconstruction should be evaluated compared to a conventional procedure. With a thorough understanding of unique characteristics of SILS, single incision distal gastrectomy (SIDG) for early gastric cancer performed by laparoscopic surgeons with advanced technique is expected to have promising potential about excellent cosmesis, comparable morbidity and mortality in carefully selected patients. For appropriate adoption and steady progress of this state-of-the art surgery, scientific evaluation with healthy critics is necessary with new generation of SILS instrument platform.

show abstract

“…Various research has been undertaken to assess early results and complications of SPLC compared to MPLC. These studies have proven the feasibility and safety of the SPLC for benign and malignant colorectal diseases even in emergencies (1,6,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). It has been shown that distinct benefits of SPLC over MPLC consist of using only one umbilical entry point with multiple incorporated working channels, reducing pain and complications like bleeding, hernia, tissue trauma, and improving the cosmesis (22)(23)(24)(25)(26).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer

Hosseini¹,

Akool²,

Zamani³

2018

Ann Colorectal Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In recent years, single-port laparoscopic colectomy (SPLC) has been introduced as a new technique for colorectal surgery. Despite several studies, available results are too sparse to accurately identify differences between SPLC and conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MPLC). In a continuing effort, the aim of this study was to compare these two techniques in colon cancer patients. Methods: 76 patients with colon cancer who underwent either SPLC or MPLC took part in this study. Demographic data and complications such as age, gender, operative time, hospital stay, intra-operative blood volume loss, and internal organ injury were assessed. The patients were followed up for 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software using Student's t-test, Chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test. Results: The complications were similar in both SPLC and MPLC groups. Operative time was significantly lower in SPLC (P = 0.003). No significant differences were observed in other factors (P > 0.05). Conclusions: According to studies conducted so far, it seems that the difference in the surgeon's experience, types of the colorectal diseases, and types of the colorectal resection may affect the outcomes like operative time and hospital stay. Therefore, further coherent investigations with larger datasets are essential for a detailed comparison.

show abstract

The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Cited by 155 publications

References 29 publications

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Single incision gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Comparative Outcomes Analysis of Single-Port versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy in Colon Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About