1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb02745.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shortfall in published research: a study of nurses' research and publication activities

Abstract: Although in recent years there has been increasing pressure on nurses to become more research minded, available evidence still suggests that there is a significant shortfall in published nursing research. To date, it has not been clear whether this lack of output is a function of nurses' failure either to conduct research in the first place or to get it published. It is self-evident that if patient care is to be enhanced through research, then the reasons for the low output must be investigated systematically … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Olsen and second author (2014) found in their action learning project that bringing a group of novice and experienced practitioners, clinical experts, leaders and researchers together worked as a multistage focus group (Hummelvoll, 2008) characterized by togetherness, synergy and elevation of the participants' knowledge. Almost 20 years ago Hicks (1995) suggested that nurse managers on all levels should show their support if they were serious about nurses conducting research and Roxburgh contests that not much has changed (Roxburgh, 2006). Akerjordet et al (2012) also mention the critical role of nursing managers as strategic in developing a research culture among clinical nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Olsen and second author (2014) found in their action learning project that bringing a group of novice and experienced practitioners, clinical experts, leaders and researchers together worked as a multistage focus group (Hummelvoll, 2008) characterized by togetherness, synergy and elevation of the participants' knowledge. Almost 20 years ago Hicks (1995) suggested that nurse managers on all levels should show their support if they were serious about nurses conducting research and Roxburgh contests that not much has changed (Roxburgh, 2006). Akerjordet et al (2012) also mention the critical role of nursing managers as strategic in developing a research culture among clinical nurses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reasons reported include being insecure with their chosen research methodology, lacking confidence to write, diminished confidence in their research, and insufficient time to pursue writing activities. 4,6 Editorials have been written that lament the fact that nurses do not publish research results as frequently as they should and implore nurses to consider publication as an obligation. 1,7 For those who choose to forge ahead and publish their research results, there are some obstacles that need to be navigated.…”
Section: Barriers To Researchmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A study of nurses in England showed that that 71% of the nurses were involved with research but only 58% wrote the results up, 10% had submitted their research for publication, and 9% were accepted for publication. 4 It has been noted that academic Australian nurses do not publish to the same degree as other disciplines. 5 Nurses may not publish their research because of a number of reasons.…”
Section: Barriers To Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, there was no evidence to suggest that this approach made any difference and it is acknowledged that enthusiasm actually waned. Hicks (1995) investigated the reasons why the publication rate of nurses is low although evidence-based practice is on the increase; one suggestion is a lack of research being conducted. A random sample of 500 nationally selected nurses were sent a questionnaire which also addressed research activities and attitudes to research.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%