1997
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/77.10.1079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: The Construct Validity and Responsiveness of a Region-Specific Disability Measure

Abstract: Most correlations between SPADI and SIP scores provided support for the construct validity of the SPADI. The SPADI does not appear to strongly reflect occupational and recreational disability and is more responsive than the SIP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
100
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
100
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) which is a self-administered instrument developed to measure pain (five items) and disability (eight items) associated with shoulder complaints. 8,9 In order to provide a frame of reference, the questions related to the preceding week. Patients assessed their status on an analogue scale in which a score of zero was given for 'no pain' and 100 for the 'worst pain imaginable' for the five pain items, and zero for 'no difficulty' and 100 for 'difficulty requiring assistance' for the eight disability items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) which is a self-administered instrument developed to measure pain (five items) and disability (eight items) associated with shoulder complaints. 8,9 In order to provide a frame of reference, the questions related to the preceding week. Patients assessed their status on an analogue scale in which a score of zero was given for 'no pain' and 100 for the 'worst pain imaginable' for the five pain items, and zero for 'no difficulty' and 100 for 'difficulty requiring assistance' for the eight disability items.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The index is sensitive to clinical changes in patients with pathology of the shoulder. 9 The recommendations for conducting a randomised, controlled trial emphasise the importance of the use of patient-based outcome measures such as the SPADI in order to reflect clearly the patient's concerns. 10,11 This contrasts with the Constant-Murley shoulder score, 12 which is not completely patient-based.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPADI has been studied extensively and determined to be a valid and reliable instrument that is responsive to change. 3,15,23,34 The minimal clinically important change has been defined as greater than a 10-point decrease in score. 34 We used a 10-point change by day 6 to define success.…”
Section: Taping Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPADI is reliable, 40 valid, 39 and responsive 4 for shoulder pain of musculoskeletal, neurogenic, or undetermined origin. 27,56,57 The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the SPADI is 10 points. 42,67 The ASES scale consists of equally weighted pain and disability subscales, where the 2 subscales are combined to produce a total score ranging from 0 (highest levels of pain and functional difficulty) to 100 (no pain and no functional difficulty).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%