1985
DOI: 10.1002/sca.4950070104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shrinkage of bulk polymers by radiation damage in an SEM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, physical aging and cross-linking in polymeric fibers subjected to the SEM electron beam do not permit its use. 31 Instead, the tension tests were performed under an optical microscope at 500ϫ magnification by recording digital images with 1280 ϫ 1024 pixel resolution. The nanofiber diameter was prohibitively small ͑300-600 nm͒ to view the fiber and measure its elongation directly by using optics.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, physical aging and cross-linking in polymeric fibers subjected to the SEM electron beam do not permit its use. 31 Instead, the tension tests were performed under an optical microscope at 500ϫ magnification by recording digital images with 1280 ϫ 1024 pixel resolution. The nanofiber diameter was prohibitively small ͑300-600 nm͒ to view the fiber and measure its elongation directly by using optics.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, compared to the variable loading rate that can be accomplished by the approach presented in this article, the use of an SEM allows only for quasistatic tension tests as a result of its rastering action. In our work, the vulnerability of electrospun nanofibers to e-beam radiation, 31 the large fiber ductility, 20 and the strain rate dependent mechanical behavior of the electrospun polymers demanded testing outside an SEM. Thus, the method of subpixel displacement measurements applied here was required to conduct this category of experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since at high magnification large electron doses are necessary to generate a sufficient S/N ratio, beam damage is of great concern. Thin continuous coatings of 1-2 nm thickness stabilized the surface features against such damage because the metal films provided a sufficient mechanical support (Isaacson, 1977) and prevented volume loss conventionally observed on electron beam radiated uncoated organic particles (Kahler & Lloyd, 1952;Peters & Green, 1983;Reimer & Schmidt, 1985). The thin films prevented excessive electron-specimen interactions and allowed microscopy to be performed directly on the coated bulk organic specimens without the need to prepare a replica from the surface Peters, 1985b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highest topographic resolution is established with such a film thickness as is needed to generate sufficient but not excessive contrast. However, metal film application is additionally governed by some practical considerations concerning beam damage during microscopy (Isaacson, 1977;Reimer & Schmidt, 1985). Here, the rationale for thin continuous metal film application is experimentally determined for TEM and SEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we are not aware of detailed comparisons of LTA and SOA with regards to radiation dose efficiency as well as reconstruction quality. Low radiation dose is critical for X-ray imaging of soft materials, since they are vulnerable to beam-induced damage and distortion [14]. Moreover, other factors may also come into play when one does either SOA or LTA in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%