The Shrinking of the European Union and its Integration Capability

Butorina, Olga

doi:10.15211/soveurope220202032

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Причём, если первое событие чуть не произошло в 2015 г. (ситуацию спасла в основном Германия) и остаётся потенциальным, то второе -состоялось [15,16]. Последствия данных феноменов для ЕС огромны.…”

Section: свобода мобильностиunclassified

“…Произошло «развенчание мифа» о ЕС как образцово-показательной и непрерывно прогрессирующей модели интеграции. Обострились вопросы и дискуссии о выгодности/невыгодности (прежде всего -экономической) интеграции для каждого государства, преследующего собственные интересы, и многие другие [7,16]. Однако в данном случае речь не идёт о том, что для ЕС, выражаясь словами С. Есенина, «скатилась со счастья вожжа» или у него вообще нет интеграционных достижений.…”

Section: свобода мобильностиunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integration Processes in the World Economy: a Nooapproach and Development of Eurasian Space

Аrkhipova¹

2023

Econ. Rev. Rus.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within the current conditions and realities – namely, aggravation of inter-country conflicts, continuous chains of financial and economic crises, unpredictable epidemics and pandemic, increasing threats and risks to the existence of humanity – issues of integration and solidarity are becoming particularly relevant. At the same time, the existing theories of integration and approaches to its interpretation, identification of stages and evaluation of results are very specific due to the concentration mainly on economic and political-economic processes, as well as often because of their “sharpening” for the European Union. The purpose of this paper is to develop an alternative (to the “classical” one) approach to the determination and analysis of integration based on the theory of noonomy worked out by S. D. Bodrunov. The article provides evidence of an overestimating the results of European integration, based mainly on the creation in theory and practice of its idealized image of this continuously progressive and exemplary model that stands out from the rest of the world. The basic provisions and conclusions of noonomy, the “parallels” of this theory and the results of its “conjugation” with the theory of changing technological modes and the concept of changing world economic modes, worked out by S. Y. Glazyev, are presented. We enter the concept of “noointegration”, highlight its main stages and analyze the differences and correlation of its processes with classical integration. It is explained why noo-integration, without denying economic integration at the pre-noonomic stage of public life, turns out to be of a higher priority and more useful for the harmonious joint development of the Eurasian space and its participating countries than the classical integration model.

show abstract

Section: свобода мобильностиunclassified

Integration Processes in the World Economy: a Nooapproach and Development of Eurasian Space

Аrkhipova¹

2023

Econ. Rev. Rus.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Reform of the Treaty on the European Union: Implement Impossible Abandon

Potemkina

2022

Her. Russ. Acad. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sovereignty vs Development. Belarusian Economy in the Context of Current Trends in World Development

Shamakhov

Mezhevich

2020

Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of sovereignty is now a cross-cutting and general scientific problem. In relation to Russian-Belarusian relations, it is primarily related to issues of economic sovereignty. Ideally, the solution of theoretical questions and practical actions in the field of integration should be spaced over time. However, in practice this is not always possible. Country economic models are not a new subject of study. However, there are not many such works in Belarus. In the article, the authors tried not only to indicate significant points of the Belarusian economic model. The need to develop integration within the framework of the union state of Russia and Belarus is practically not disputed by anyone. In practice, however, this integration has been slow. From our point of view, one of the reasons for this situation is the inattention to the fact that over 30 years of post-Soviet development in Belarus, as well as throughout the post- Soviet space, different economic models have developed. Understanding economic sovereignty in the era of globalization 2.0 is a difficult task for theorists and practitioners. How to reconcile the traditions of sovereignty and the need to deepen integration? This article is devoted to these issues.

show abstract

The Shrinking of the European Union and its Integration Capability

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Integration Processes in the World Economy: a Nooapproach and Development of Eurasian Space

Integration Processes in the World Economy: a Nooapproach and Development of Eurasian Space

Reform of the Treaty on the European Union: Implement Impossible Abandon

Sovereignty vs Development. Belarusian Economy in the Context of Current Trends in World Development

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About