Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Pressure-transient models are presented for evaluation of the behavior of vertical, vertically fractured, and horizontal wells in radial and linear (three-region) composite reservoirs with moving fluid fronts. The Laplace Transform Finite Difference (LTFD) numerical solution methodology combined with the well- known Buckley-Leverett (BL) frontal-advance equation have been used to develop solutions for the moving boundary problem. Hybrid semi-analytic and numerical solutions have been constructed for finite-conductivity vertical fractures and infinite-conductivity horizontal wellbores. Complete descriptions of the mathematical models are presented; the pressure-transient solutions, frontal position and velocity, and saturation distributions. Indications are that monitoring of the transient behavior permits detection of water encroachment to the producing well, prior to breakthrough. This enables modifications in the production operations to be taken proactively to delay breakthrough. The results of the pressure-transient models reported in this paper have been compared with the available moving boundary radial composite solutions in the literature and the results of the vertically fractured and horizontal well solutions have been validated using analytic and numerical reservoir simulation. Six well and reservoir model combinations have been considered in this investigation for which oilfield applications exist for each composite system considered. These include solutions of the pressure-transient behavior of an unfractured vertical well in a radial composite reservoir, a vertically fractured well in linear and radial composite systems, a horizontal well in radial and linear composite systems, and a vertical fracture intersected by a horizontal well in a linear composite system. Extension of the solution methodology used in this study for evaluating the pressure-transient behavior of a selectively completed horizontal wellbore in a cylindrical composite reservoir has also been considered in this study. Each of these solutions include moving fluid fronts, whose position and velocity are determined from the frontal advance model and fractional flow theory. General fractional flow solutions have been implemented that utilize conventional laboratory relative permeability measurements.
Pressure-transient models are presented for evaluation of the behavior of vertical, vertically fractured, and horizontal wells in radial and linear (three-region) composite reservoirs with moving fluid fronts. The Laplace Transform Finite Difference (LTFD) numerical solution methodology combined with the well- known Buckley-Leverett (BL) frontal-advance equation have been used to develop solutions for the moving boundary problem. Hybrid semi-analytic and numerical solutions have been constructed for finite-conductivity vertical fractures and infinite-conductivity horizontal wellbores. Complete descriptions of the mathematical models are presented; the pressure-transient solutions, frontal position and velocity, and saturation distributions. Indications are that monitoring of the transient behavior permits detection of water encroachment to the producing well, prior to breakthrough. This enables modifications in the production operations to be taken proactively to delay breakthrough. The results of the pressure-transient models reported in this paper have been compared with the available moving boundary radial composite solutions in the literature and the results of the vertically fractured and horizontal well solutions have been validated using analytic and numerical reservoir simulation. Six well and reservoir model combinations have been considered in this investigation for which oilfield applications exist for each composite system considered. These include solutions of the pressure-transient behavior of an unfractured vertical well in a radial composite reservoir, a vertically fractured well in linear and radial composite systems, a horizontal well in radial and linear composite systems, and a vertical fracture intersected by a horizontal well in a linear composite system. Extension of the solution methodology used in this study for evaluating the pressure-transient behavior of a selectively completed horizontal wellbore in a cylindrical composite reservoir has also been considered in this study. Each of these solutions include moving fluid fronts, whose position and velocity are determined from the frontal advance model and fractional flow theory. General fractional flow solutions have been implemented that utilize conventional laboratory relative permeability measurements.
Electrical submersible pump (ESP) is the main artificial lift system in Shushufindi field. These systems besides facing high gas production, high scale and corrosion tendencies, also have to deal with surface fluid handling and electrical power limitations which combined impose challenges to optimize the ESP system. In perspective, the digitalization initiative has been key to integrate data in order to have a big picture of the actual field condition and ultimately to enhance oil production. Various dashboards have been created using the business intelligence tool to provide real time information. ESP dashboard shows opportunities to optimize the ESP unit by integrating real time and manual entry data to optimize frequency, surface equipment, opportunities for pump upsizing, and re-designing the ESP downhole equipment. The result of this analysis is derived from ESP simulation, nodal analysis, chemical treatment monitoring and real time surveillance of the ESP parameters. Dashboards of water handling, electrical power, and chemical treatment are utilized to support process analysis providing current field status, with also the feedback from operational and engineering recommendations. Comprehensive real time monitoring resulted in average of 500 bopd less production deferment in the last 12 months as the result of early detection and a proper operational optimization (chemical treatment, gas flaring, and choke optimization) of the unstable wells. Strategic decisions have been executed to ensure the availability of water handling capacity and electrical power for each production station such as stimulating disposal wells, cleaning injection flowlines, and repairing power generations. Up to 3,000 bopd total incremental has been generated in the last 12 months as the result of 17 upsizing operations, optimizing frequency in 68 wells, and optimizing surface equipment in 35 wells. The associated mean time between failures (MTBF) of ESP system has increased over the time from 224 days in 2013 to 674 days in 2020. Digitalization is a game changer for optimizing the oilfield production and to reduce associated operation risks from features as of real time surveillance, EDGE computing, remote actuation, and big data intelligence. This paper will elaborate in detail on how digitalization can be valuable in optimizing ESP system with a successful case study in Shushufindi field.
Waterflooding project has been implemented in Shushufindi-Aguarico mature field since late 2014. Having a compatible and cost-effective injected water is one of the key elements to ensure the success of this project. In perspective, water treatment plant was constructed in 2014 during pilot stage while water sources wells were completed in 2019 as an alternative source of injected water at the expansion stage of waterflooding project. This paper presents the comparison between both systems used as part of the water injection strategy: the Water Injection Plant (WIP) and Water Producer Wells (WPW). A complete system of water treatment plant is located in one of the production stations. The process basically starts by collecting water from production wells and workovers then treating it mechanically using a flotation unit and chemically to remove solid as well as oil contents. The water is then injected into injection wells with the help of horizontal pumping system (HPS). In the system of water source wells, two wells were converted to produce water from Hollin water reservoir utilizing electrical submersible pumps (ESP). The water is directly injected without any treatment into injection wells given the analysis of its fluid properties. The initial investment for water treatment plant is four times compared to water source well providing equal injection capacity where the operational cost per barrel of injected water is similar. The operational cost for water treatment plant refers to surface facilities maintenance and daily chemical consumption while for water source well it refers to associated cost of ESP reparation and workover operation. The average run-life of the water source wells in Ecuador Oriente basin is 1,200 days. The biggest challenge of water treatment plant is dealing with solid content whereas for water source well is on how to ensure integrity of the well and the flowline system in the high temperature and CO2 environment. Continuous improvements have been performed to address these challenges such as chemical treatment adjustments, real-time surveillance of injection wells, and modification of flowline system. Water treatment plant not only provides compatible water for injection wells but also supports water handling capacity as it utilizes water from production wells. In the other hand, compatible and clean water from Hollin water reservoir is the main benefit of water source wells. This paper will outline the pros and cons of water treatment plant and water source well based on field evaluation in Shushufindi-Aguarico field. It outlines the operational experience and lessons learned that can be used as a guide and reference when evaluating water sources for a waterflooding strategy. Economical analysis as well as continuous improvement will also be presented in this paper to deliver an integrated analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.