“…Consequently, genetic investigations have often revealed systematic inconsistencies, as well as many cryptic species (Vogel, Cosson & Lopez Jurado, 2003;Dubey et al, 2006Dubey et al, , 2007aYannic et al, 2012;Jacquet et al, 2013;Stanley et al, 2013). For example, in the genus Crocidura, the shrews from Sicily (Crocidura sicula) and Canary Islands (Crocidura canariensis) were considered as conspecific by Sarà (1995Sarà ( , 1996 as a result of the identity of their karyotype (Hutterer, Lopez-Jurado & Vogel, 1987;Vogel, 1988), whereas molecular dating revealed that these two taxa split 5 Mya [cytochrome b gene (Cytb) genetic distance: 14%; Vogel et al, 2003;Dubey et al, 2008a]. In addition, local adaptations may also lead to important morphological differences within a single species, as in the African Crocidura olivieri (with local morphs varying from 20 to 120 g and fur coloration from beige to black), leading to the description of invalid (sub-)species (see genetic study of Dubey et al, 2007b).…”