1987
DOI: 10.2113/gseegeosci.xxiv.2.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sieved Slake Durability Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main problem with the slake durability index test according to various researchers (Czerewko and Cripps, 2001;Erguler and Shakoor, 2009and Richardson and Long, 1987, Moon and Beattie, 1995 is that the test is not efficient in differentiating durable from non-durable mudrocks ( Figure 2). This is mainly because of the 2 mm mesh size which may retain a large portion of slaked material even for non-durable rocks…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The main problem with the slake durability index test according to various researchers (Czerewko and Cripps, 2001;Erguler and Shakoor, 2009and Richardson and Long, 1987, Moon and Beattie, 1995 is that the test is not efficient in differentiating durable from non-durable mudrocks ( Figure 2). This is mainly because of the 2 mm mesh size which may retain a large portion of slaked material even for non-durable rocks…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this, ASTM 4644 -08 suggests a qualitative description of the retained material as Type I-virtually unchanged large fragments, Type II -large and small fragments, and Type III -exclusively small fragments. Other problems include the formation of mud balls (larger than 2 mm) during testing rocks with plastic clays (Richardson and Long, 1987).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations