1982
DOI: 10.1190/1.1441289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The signature of an air gun array: Computation from near‐field measurements including interactions

Abstract: We designed a system to enable the signature of an air gun array to be calculated at any point in the water from a number of simultaneous independent measurements of the near‐field pressure field [subject of a patent application]. The number of these measurements must not be less than the number of guns in the array. The underlying assumption in our method is that the oscillating bubble produced by an air gun is small compared with the wavelengths of seismic interest. Each bubble thus behaves as a point source… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
161
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The source was positioned at approximately 3,5,7,10,15,20,25,30,35, and 40 m, and a hydrophone was positioned 20 m below the source. The far-field signatures for sources fired at different depths were estimated by the notional source method (Ziolkowski et al, 1982) and then convolved with the source ghost functions for the respective source depths. The data were filtered with a high-cut filter (230-250 Hz) and normalized to the highest amplitude.…”
Section: Optimal Source Depths Using Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source was positioned at approximately 3,5,7,10,15,20,25,30,35, and 40 m, and a hydrophone was positioned 20 m below the source. The far-field signatures for sources fired at different depths were estimated by the notional source method (Ziolkowski et al, 1982) and then convolved with the source ghost functions for the respective source depths. The data were filtered with a high-cut filter (230-250 Hz) and normalized to the highest amplitude.…”
Section: Optimal Source Depths Using Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the simple tapering process might not be good enough to generate the pure first arrivals. An appropriate treatment could be a global debubbling operation (Ziolkowski et al, 1980(Ziolkowski et al, , 1982 with respect to all the VSP downgoing waveforms because this would help to clean up the waveform before muting. …”
Section: D222 Wangmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability makes airgun array signature modeling complex and difficult. One can estimate the signature from near-field measurements of an airgun array (Ziolkowski et al, 1982(Ziolkowski et al, , 1997Laws et al, 1998), but during the CEEs we studied, no near-field measurements of airgun pulses were made. An alternative way to estimate the signature of an airgun array is to treat each element as a monopole source and consider the geometric configuration of the array.…”
Section: Alrgun Array Beampattern Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%