2005
DOI: 10.1002/esp.1188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of channel recharge rates for estimating debris‐flow magnitude and frequency

Abstract: . This result suggests that for the same elapsed time since the last debris flow, clearcut gullies tend to recharge at a slower rate than creeks in old growth forest. This finding requires verification, particularly for longer elapsed times since debris flow, but would have important implications for forest resource management in steep coastal terrain. This study demonstrates that commonly used encounter probability equations are inappropriate for recharge-limited debris flow channels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
100
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is known as debris-flow bulking and the rate at which debris-flows scour the channel is referred as the yield rate (expressed in m 3 per unit length of channel). Therefore, the presence of erodible sediment in headwater channels is recognized as a primary control on the timing and magnitude of debris-flows (Jakob et al, 2005). Some authors proposed to discriminate supply-and transport-limited debrisflow catchments as a function of the sediment recharge rate for low-order channels, this being defined as the rate at which colluvium fills the scoured channel after the passage of a debris-flow (Bovis and Jakob, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is known as debris-flow bulking and the rate at which debris-flows scour the channel is referred as the yield rate (expressed in m 3 per unit length of channel). Therefore, the presence of erodible sediment in headwater channels is recognized as a primary control on the timing and magnitude of debris-flows (Jakob et al, 2005). Some authors proposed to discriminate supply-and transport-limited debrisflow catchments as a function of the sediment recharge rate for low-order channels, this being defined as the rate at which colluvium fills the scoured channel after the passage of a debris-flow (Bovis and Jakob, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supply of loose debris plays an important role in the occurrence of future debris flows during subsequent rainfall events (Jakob et al, 2005). Both the critical rainfall threshold for debris flow initiation and the number of debris flows caused by a rainfall event may differ before and after an extreme rainfall event or a major earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual surges and presumably smaller events may have caused GD to trees but did not eliminate entire sectors in the past. Jakob et al (2005) highlighted the importance of channel recharge rates in the triggering of debris-flow events. At Torrent de la Fouly, small rocks are readily available and debris supply cannot be considered a limiting factor here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%