2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of clean and dirty animals for bacterial dynamics along the beef chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hide-to-carcasses microbial cross-contamination can occur under commercial conditions [27,28,29,30]. However, [Hauge, et al [31]] suggested that higher loads of MA and EB found in dirty cattle hides does not impact the hygienic quality of the carcasses, resulting in carcasses with the same quality of those obtained from animals with clean hides. Anyway, it is important to clarify that carcasses contamination may be influenced by other factors, such as design of each facility and training of employees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hide-to-carcasses microbial cross-contamination can occur under commercial conditions [27,28,29,30]. However, [Hauge, et al [31]] suggested that higher loads of MA and EB found in dirty cattle hides does not impact the hygienic quality of the carcasses, resulting in carcasses with the same quality of those obtained from animals with clean hides. Anyway, it is important to clarify that carcasses contamination may be influenced by other factors, such as design of each facility and training of employees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring of the total bacterial counts and Enterobacteriaceae is required at slaughterhouses in the EU according to Commission Regulation (EC) 2073/2005. The counts of aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae and E. coli on the carcasses vary between slaughterhouses, depending on animals’ cleanliness, slaughter procedures (such as decontamination) and other factors, and are generally higher than those found in this study [ 54 , 56 , 57 ]. According to the EU requirements specified in Commission Regulation (EC) 2073/2005, daily means of less than 3.5 log CFU/cm 2 of total aerobic bacteria and 1.5 log CFU/cm 2 of Enterobacteriaceae demonstrate a satisfactory hygienic status of cattle carcasses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Ahmad et al (2013) sampled 100 cm 2 of the forequarter and hindquarter of the beef carcasses and reported an APC value of 2.8 log. Hauge et al (2015) reported 4.3 to 4.5 log after 24-h chilling. However, these authors did not use spray chilling with antimicrobials.…”
Section: Distribution Of 24-h Marbling Score and Quality Grade And Fa...mentioning
confidence: 99%