2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00577-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
168
0
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
168
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of structural diversity indices and classical stand structure measures provided a synthetic description of stand structure. Structural diversity measures included species richness, diameter standard deviation, and Vertical Evenness index, a measure of vertical structure 9 complexity (Neumann and Starlinger 2000). For the stumps we measured the height, the diameter at the top and at the ground level.…”
Section: Stand Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of structural diversity indices and classical stand structure measures provided a synthetic description of stand structure. Structural diversity measures included species richness, diameter standard deviation, and Vertical Evenness index, a measure of vertical structure 9 complexity (Neumann and Starlinger 2000). For the stumps we measured the height, the diameter at the top and at the ground level.…”
Section: Stand Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many studies which focus on the methodology to characterize stand structure [11,12,14,18,22,24], only few studies compare different indices of stand structure in Mediterranean forests.…”
Section: F Montes Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few extensive studies of stand structure suggest that different indices of stand structure closely correlate with each other, so that analyses may be based on a relatively small number of variables that are most indicative (McElhinny et al, 2005;Neumann and Starlinger, 2001;Pommerening, 2002;Zenner and Hibbs, 2000). In monospecific stands, shifting from spatially regular thinning to less regular but more intense harvest events or increasing the duration of the regeneration period may increase structural diversity throughout the whole rotation period (Barbeito et al, 2011;Peck et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%