2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10827-014-0519-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of dynamical architecture for adaptive responses to mechanical loads during rhythmic behavior

Abstract: Many behaviors require reliably generating sequences of motor activity while adapting the activity to incoming sensory information. This process has often been conceptually explained as either fully dependent on sensory input (a chain reflex) or fully independent of sensory input (an idealized central pattern generator, or CPG), although the consensus of the field is that most neural pattern generators lie somewhere between these two extremes. Many mathematical models of neural pattern generators use limit cyc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(91 reference statements)
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have shown, animals may extend the duration of the power stroke (retraction) of swallowing when load is encountered. This is consistent with predictions made by a nominal neuromechanical model of Aplysia feeding (Shaw et al, 2015;Lyttle et al, 2017). Similarly, in vertebrate and stick insect locomotion, increased load during the stance phase causes increased excitation to the leg extensor muscles (Pearson, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As we have shown, animals may extend the duration of the power stroke (retraction) of swallowing when load is encountered. This is consistent with predictions made by a nominal neuromechanical model of Aplysia feeding (Shaw et al, 2015;Lyttle et al, 2017). Similarly, in vertebrate and stick insect locomotion, increased load during the stance phase causes increased excitation to the leg extensor muscles (Pearson, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Section 2.1 lays out the assumptions needed to establish our results, and Section 2.2 presents the main Theorem (2.1) giving the correction to the iPRC upon crossing a switching boundary. Section 3 provides examples of iPRCs in nonsmooth systems: a planar piecewise constant system where the nonlinearities arise strictly from the boundaries in Section 3.1, a planar PWL oscillator introduced in a motor control context [55], but generalized here to a non-symmetric geometry in Section 3.2, a PWL genetic regulatory circuit model (Glass network [19,20]) in Section 3.3, a three-dimensional motor control model [54] in Section 3.4, a four-dimensional weakly diffusively coupled version of the piecewise constant system in Section 3.4.1, and a six-dimensional threshold linear network model comprising of two weakly coupled three-dimensional oscillators [42] in Section 3.4.2. In Section 4.1, we discuss the relation between our boundary-crossing correction matrix and the classical saltation matrix, in Section 4.2, we discuss the limitations of the method, and in Section 4.3, we discuss a range of possible further applications.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proprioception has been shown to play a role in altering RN activity as the animal switches from biting to swallowing (Evans and Cropper 1998). Modeling work suggests that sensory feedback may play critical roles in lengthening components of behavior (e.g., the retraction phase, mediated in part by grasper closure, i.e., RN activity) due to the dynamics of Aplysia's feeding pattern generator (Shaw et al 2014). Furthermore, sensory input may move the system into and through the correct "solution space" for swallowing behavior.…”
Section: Controlling and Exploiting Neuronal And Biomechanical Variabmentioning
confidence: 99%