1964
DOI: 10.1159/000239927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Significance of Facial Skin Temperature in the Chemical Heat Regulation of Premature Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1968
1968
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Abdominal skin temperature was measured with a thermistor probe taped to the mid-epigastrium, beside but not touching the se~ocontrol probe. Cheek skin temperature was monitored to assure that facial temperature was not changing sufficiently to alter the rate of oxygen consumption (24). Heel skin temperature was monitored with a probe taped to the heel pad.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdominal skin temperature was measured with a thermistor probe taped to the mid-epigastrium, beside but not touching the se~ocontrol probe. Cheek skin temperature was monitored to assure that facial temperature was not changing sufficiently to alter the rate of oxygen consumption (24). Heel skin temperature was monitored with a probe taped to the heel pad.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skadberg and T. Markestad, personal observation). The additional rise in peripheral skin temperature observed after covering the head may reflect a combined effect from the cover itself because the head is the main route of heat loss in young infants, [32][33][34][35][36] and the increase in metabolic rate attributable to hyperventilation from CO 2 rebreathing. This is further supported by the circulatory response with a rise in heart rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our infants who were kept warm, the trigeminus region, being an important thermoreccptive area [11,17], was especially protected from cooling at birth, with the hope of suppressing cold-induced sympathetic activity. Possibly, this aim was reached to some extent, as the warmed infants demonstrated significantly lower levels of plasma FFA than the cooled ones already in the cord 2 min after birth: that is, before any appreciable reduction in the blood flow there should occur [25], Moreover, on the one hand, there was good correspondence between the mean umbilical levels of FFA of our cooled babies and the levels observed earlier in infants born into room temperature [7,13,18], On the other hand, the mean umbilical values of our warmed infants and those of the earlier work on infants protected from cooling [15] were in agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%