1975
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-197501000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of positive margins in hemilaryngectomy specimens.

Abstract: This clinicopathologic study was undertaken to determine the meaning of surgical margins "involved" with carcinoma. The fate of hemilaryngectomy patients whose specimens had this finding was comparared with that of patients who had "uninvolved" margins. A consecutive series of 111 hemilaryngectomies performed for previously untreated invasive epidermoid carcinoma was analyzed. Serial step sections in a longitudinal plane were available for re-examination and re-evaluation of the surgical margins in each case. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This series evaluated the margins based on review of gross specimens and not by microscopic analysis. In the study by Bauer et al, 14 patients with involved hemilaryngectomy margins ran a risk of local recurrence three times greater than those with uninvolved margins. However, Bauer et al pointed out that there was not an increased adverse survival effect with positive margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This series evaluated the margins based on review of gross specimens and not by microscopic analysis. In the study by Bauer et al, 14 patients with involved hemilaryngectomy margins ran a risk of local recurrence three times greater than those with uninvolved margins. However, Bauer et al pointed out that there was not an increased adverse survival effect with positive margins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Differential retraction and curling of the tissues at the margins can distort normal tissue relationships, thus exposing tumor cells at a surface that is not really a surgical margin. Such difficulties can explain the lack of correlation observed by some authors between recurrence rate and the tumor involvement of surgical margins (17).…”
Section: Tumor Infiltration Of Surgical Marginsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the contrary several authors have reported absence of tumor in as much as 30% of the excised specimens after definitive procedure (microlaryngoscopic or open partial laryngectomy) has been undertaken following diagnostic confirmation of malignancy. Further, Bauer et al [11] have followed up R1 resections after vertical partial laryngectomy to note recurrence in only 18% (7 of 39). This reflects the low grade histology and efficacy of minimum margins in the realms of 3-4 mm following open partial laryngectomy as well as the recent trend of transtumoral laser microresection in large tumors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%