2020
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3266-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Significance of Recognizing Myocardial Bridge in the Coronary Spasm Diagnosis in Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

Abstract: A 61-year-old man experienced chest oppression for 1 hour. He was positive for troponin T and underwent emergent coronary angiography (CAG), which did not reveal significant coronary stenosis. He was diagnosed with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). We performed a spasmprovocation test, which revealed a focal spasm at the segment of the myocardial bridge. After receiving a calcium-channel blocker, he exhibited a good clinical course. Coronary spasm is considered an underlying… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MB can increase the risk of developing coronary artery spasm, [ 34 ] which has been shown to be an important cause of MI and non-obstructive coronary arteries. [ 35 , 36 ] Hiroki Teragawa et al [ 37 ] reported a case of non-obstructive coronary MI and detected the presence of coronary artery spasm in the patient MB segments by spasm provocation test, which may be related to the constrictive kinking of the vessels leading to their endothelial dysfunction and increased local vascular reactivity to systemic vasoconstrictor stimulation. [ 27 ] Purumeh Nam et al [ 38 ] performed acetylcholine stimulation test and found that the incidence of coronary artery spasm was 59.1%, and patients with MB combined coronary artery spasm had a highrate of angina recurrence, proving that MB are one of the important risk factors for coronary artery spasm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MB can increase the risk of developing coronary artery spasm, [ 34 ] which has been shown to be an important cause of MI and non-obstructive coronary arteries. [ 35 , 36 ] Hiroki Teragawa et al [ 37 ] reported a case of non-obstructive coronary MI and detected the presence of coronary artery spasm in the patient MB segments by spasm provocation test, which may be related to the constrictive kinking of the vessels leading to their endothelial dysfunction and increased local vascular reactivity to systemic vasoconstrictor stimulation. [ 27 ] Purumeh Nam et al [ 38 ] performed acetylcholine stimulation test and found that the incidence of coronary artery spasm was 59.1%, and patients with MB combined coronary artery spasm had a highrate of angina recurrence, proving that MB are one of the important risk factors for coronary artery spasm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some patients with vasospastic angina (VSA) experience prolonged chest symptoms[ 1 ]. The guidelines for VSA[ 2 ] note that chest pain in patients with VSA usually occurs at rest, with pain persisting for several minutes up to approximately 15 min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well-known that coronary spastic angina, also known as vasospastic angina (VSA), is characterized by transient vasoconstriction of epicardial coronary arteries, leading to myocardial ischemia ( 1 - 3 ). Coronary artery spasm causes rest angina, exertional angina, acute myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death, and heart failure ( 3 - 5 ). The mechanisms of coronary artery spasm are multi-factorial and include an abnormal autonomic nervous system response, endothelial dysfunction in the coronary artery or systemic peripheral vasculature, vascular smooth muscle cell hyperresponsiveness, magnesium deficiency, genetics, and a certain anatomy of the coronary arteries ( 3 , 6 - 8 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%