2021
DOI: 10.1785/0220200391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Silencing of U.S. Campuses Following the COVID-19 Response: Evaluating Root Mean Square Seismic Amplitudes Using Power Spectral Density Data

Abstract: In response to the COVID-19 global pandemic, many populated and active regions have become deserted and show significant reductions in their background seismicity, especially campuses across the United States (U.S.). Seismic sensors located in the vicinity of or within U.S. campuses show that anthropogenic seismic noise remains elevated during the ordinary, nonpandemic, academic year, only subduing during periods of recess (e.g., winter break). Here, we use power spectral density (PSD) data computed by the Inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The noise level is generally higher during 12-24 UTC (6-18 in local time) than 0-12 UTC (18-6 in local time) (Figures 12a and 12b). Similar day and night variations of seismic noise from the PSDs have been related to urban activities (Díaz et al, 2017;Guenaga et al, 2021;Jana et al, 2017). Since the FRS is located in a rural environment with minimal interference from urban noise, a significant portion of the seismic noise presumably comes from the injection activities in the study area.…”
Section: Persistent Noise Near the Injection Wellmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The noise level is generally higher during 12-24 UTC (6-18 in local time) than 0-12 UTC (18-6 in local time) (Figures 12a and 12b). Similar day and night variations of seismic noise from the PSDs have been related to urban activities (Díaz et al, 2017;Guenaga et al, 2021;Jana et al, 2017). Since the FRS is located in a rural environment with minimal interference from urban noise, a significant portion of the seismic noise presumably comes from the injection activities in the study area.…”
Section: Persistent Noise Near the Injection Wellmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These intricate signals are generally stronger during the day than at night, less intense on weekends than on weekdays, and more pronounced in urban areas than in rural areas [13,61,62]. Moreover, human activities can be influenced by inclement weather or traditional festivals [64,68,69]. As mentioned previously, the dominant frequency of cultural seismic noise ranges from 2 to 20 Hz in the GBA.…”
Section: Daily Human Activitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Previous studies have shown that cultural seismic noise changes significantly during traditional festivals such as the Chinese Spring Festival [44,64], Christmas [13,69], and others. In our dataset, 120 stations recorded cultural seismic noise during the New Year's Days, a three-day holiday for Chinese citizens.…”
Section: Traditional Festivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works in other countries compare the temporal variability between ASN and other observables such as mobility data from cell phone displacements in northern Italy (Poli et al, 2020), Río de Janeiro, Brazil (Dias et al, 2020), Sicily, Italy (Cannata et al, 2021), Auckland, New Zealand (van Wijk et al, 2021, Barcelona, Spain (Diaz et al, 2021), andQuerétaro, México (De Plaen et al, 2021). In addition, Xiao et al (2020) reported cultural noise changes in China, and Guenaga et al (2021) distinguished significant ASN reductions in academic institutions across the United States. These observations reveal the effect of mobility restrictions imprinted on geophysical measurements worldwide, where the pandemic caused one of the quietest recorded periods on Earth with a 50 % reduction in seismic noise (Denolle and Nissen-Meyer, 2020;Lecocq et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%