1968
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(68)80057-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The similarity of lower-case letters of the English alphabet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be due to the greater visual distinctiveness of uppercase letters in all alphabets, and the more frequent appearance of these letters in bold type in children's books, titles, labels and names. In any case, the significant role of perceptual factors in letter recognition by preschoolers was documented years ago (Dunn-Rankin, 1968;Gibson, Osser, & Pick, 1963). Moreover the superiority of uppercase over lowercase letter knowledge might be due to a teaching effect.…”
Section: Uppercase and Lowercase Letter Knowledgementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This might be due to the greater visual distinctiveness of uppercase letters in all alphabets, and the more frequent appearance of these letters in bold type in children's books, titles, labels and names. In any case, the significant role of perceptual factors in letter recognition by preschoolers was documented years ago (Dunn-Rankin, 1968;Gibson, Osser, & Pick, 1963). Moreover the superiority of uppercase over lowercase letter knowledge might be due to a teaching effect.…”
Section: Uppercase and Lowercase Letter Knowledgementioning
confidence: 97%
“…As predicted, response latencies were longer and errors were more frequent for confusable than for nonconfusable NI and DIFF pairs, whereas performance for PI pairs did not vary significantly as a function of confusability. However, the letters constituting their confusable and nonconfusable sets, B, D, P, T and F, I, M, Q, respectively, appear to differ in visual as well as acoustic similarity (Dunn-Rankin, 1968;Podgorny & Garner, 1979;Townsend, 1971aTownsend, , 1971b. Thus, the effects of "confusability" in this study could have resulted from the visual and/or the acoustic similarity of the letters used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Obviously, one of these axes is the presence of an upstroke or downstroke. Further research should aim at determining whether the b-d-p-q cluster is special in some respect or if other clusters exist, organised along other axes, as shown by Dunn-Rankin (1968) in letter recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%