“…As predicted, response latencies were longer and errors were more frequent for confusable than for nonconfusable NI and DIFF pairs, whereas performance for PI pairs did not vary significantly as a function of confusability. However, the letters constituting their confusable and nonconfusable sets, B, D, P, T and F, I, M, Q, respectively, appear to differ in visual as well as acoustic similarity (Dunn-Rankin, 1968;Podgorny & Garner, 1979;Townsend, 1971aTownsend, , 1971b. Thus, the effects of "confusability" in this study could have resulted from the visual and/or the acoustic similarity of the letters used.…”