2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1878-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The simple suture laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without an omental patch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ates et al [15] compared LPPU without an omental patch with conventional open surgery, and the mean operating time for laparoscopic repair was significantly shorter. Although several reports in the literature have demonstrated the safety of LPPU without an omental patch [15][16][17], the question remains as to whether it is safe to abandon the omental patch completely [6,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ates et al [15] compared LPPU without an omental patch with conventional open surgery, and the mean operating time for laparoscopic repair was significantly shorter. Although several reports in the literature have demonstrated the safety of LPPU without an omental patch [15][16][17], the question remains as to whether it is safe to abandon the omental patch completely [6,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closure from the Graham patch is associated with a high recurrence of the ulcer, reported in up to 63%, when Helicobacter pylori infection is not eradicated [25]. Despite the uncertainties of certain specialist to abandon the omental patch and perform only simple closure, works are described in the literature where it is plausible to repair perforations using simple closure individually [17,26]. This simple closure is based on repairing the perforation using a continuous suture technique, also called primary closure [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Ates e Dirican et al concluíram que o simples reparo sutura de PPU sem remendo omental é boa opção para o reparo com base em critérios que incluem a duração dos sintomas, o Mannheim Peritoneal Index (MPI), o escore da ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) e o tamanho da perfuração (> 12mm). 10 Um estudo retrospectivo realizado em 2013 envolvendo 179 pacientes operados de junho de 2005 a dezembro de 2012, mostrou que a sutura simples possuía tempos de permanência hospitalar, tempo para retorno da ingestão oral, complicações pós-operatórias e resultados cirúrgicos semelhantes à abordagem laparoscópica com sutura reforçada com patch omental, com a vantagem de apresentar tempo cirúrgico 11 No entanto, o reparo laparoscópico envolvendo sutura com reforço omental permanece ainda como o procedimento padrão.…”
Section: Tipos De Reparo Laparoscópicounclassified