2014
DOI: 10.1080/17586801.2014.943148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The simultaneous development of receptive skills in an orthographically transparent second language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analyses conducted to investigate RQ1 support the hypothesis that educational level likely impacts EI performance. MFR results offered no indications that EI as a test method would be incompatible with loweducated learners (Tammelin-Laine & Martin, 2015), as long as the prompts do not include pseudowords. It remains possible that performance differences between low-and highly educated learners were exacerbated by issues of test wiseness (Carlsen, 2017) because lower educated learners are not as familiar with testing procedures, which can negatively impact their result (Carlsen, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The analyses conducted to investigate RQ1 support the hypothesis that educational level likely impacts EI performance. MFR results offered no indications that EI as a test method would be incompatible with loweducated learners (Tammelin-Laine & Martin, 2015), as long as the prompts do not include pseudowords. It remains possible that performance differences between low-and highly educated learners were exacerbated by issues of test wiseness (Carlsen, 2017) because lower educated learners are not as familiar with testing procedures, which can negatively impact their result (Carlsen, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, it is vital to keep in mind that in contrast to L1 children, beginning L2 readers, including both children and adults, are faced with the challenge "of learning to read in a language that they have yet to master" (Droop & Verhoeven, 2003, p. 78); and particularly LESLLA readers are faced with the challenge of mastering both oral and written L2 skills at the same time. Tammelin- Laine and Martin (2015) identify the claim that "Finnish is written the way it is spoken" as a common misconception, pointing out that "the textual structure of speech is not the same as the structure of writing, the syntax is different, and many spoken words are seldom written and vice versa" (p. 40). Tammelin- Laine and Martin (2015) emphasize further that even in cases of regular grapheme-phoneme correspondences "mere knowledge of the letters is not enough to trigger their ability to blend sounds" (p. 39).…”
Section: The Role Of Orthographic Transparency -A Language-specific Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tammelin- Laine and Martin (2015) identify the claim that "Finnish is written the way it is spoken" as a common misconception, pointing out that "the textual structure of speech is not the same as the structure of writing, the syntax is different, and many spoken words are seldom written and vice versa" (p. 40). Tammelin- Laine and Martin (2015) emphasize further that even in cases of regular grapheme-phoneme correspondences "mere knowledge of the letters is not enough to trigger their ability to blend sounds" (p. 39).…”
Section: The Role Of Orthographic Transparency -A Language-specific Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations