2011
DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2011.557296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
80
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the end of the 20th century, Germany, the United States and other countries have consolidated research activities under the umbrella of 'Research Integrity' to impose principles on national universities, as well as universities receiving grants (Mayer 2015). The 2010 Singapore statement, an outcome of three consecutive world conferences on research integrity, lists 14 responsibilities: integrity, adherence to regulations, research methods, research findings, authorship, publication acknowledgment, peer review, conflict of interest, public communication, reporting irresponsible research practices, responding to irresponsible research practices, research environments, and societal considerations (Resnik andShamoo 2011, cf. details in Wagner andKleinert 2011).…”
Section: The Need For Codes Of Ethical Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the end of the 20th century, Germany, the United States and other countries have consolidated research activities under the umbrella of 'Research Integrity' to impose principles on national universities, as well as universities receiving grants (Mayer 2015). The 2010 Singapore statement, an outcome of three consecutive world conferences on research integrity, lists 14 responsibilities: integrity, adherence to regulations, research methods, research findings, authorship, publication acknowledgment, peer review, conflict of interest, public communication, reporting irresponsible research practices, responding to irresponsible research practices, research environments, and societal considerations (Resnik andShamoo 2011, cf. details in Wagner andKleinert 2011).…”
Section: The Need For Codes Of Ethical Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, it is unacceptable that scientific misconduct discovered by the US Food and Drug Administration is not reported to the public [10]. Basically, research should be founded on the sound principle of Bresponsible conduct of research^ [11].…”
Section: Scientific Misconductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the meantime as the debate goes on whether to establish national and institutional offices of research integrity in Uganda or not, centres of higher learning and research institutions should adopt the 'Singapore statement' 10 as a reference point for a shared understanding of research integrity in the country. The Singapore statement emphasizes the principles and professional responsibilities that define research integrity irrespective of national and cultural disparities in standards for scientific research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Singapore statement emphasizes the principles and professional responsibilities that define research integrity irrespective of national and cultural disparities in standards for scientific research. 10 The statement enunciates four basic principles: honesty in all aspects of research; accountability in the conduct of research; professional courtesy and fairness in working with others; and stewardship of research on behalf of others 10 . It also enumerates 14 fundamental responsibilities for researchers and research institutions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%