2012
DOI: 10.1556/aling.59.2012.1-2.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The single morpheme -ed/-enof the English past/passive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The answer is because this V have must occur with a participle with the separate morphology of -en, a morpheme which when active spells out Past, i.e. [+T]; for arguments to this effect, see Emonds (2012 Realis future with going to are close to synonymous; it is next to impossible to find contexts where one is well-formed and/or appropriate and the other is clearly not (though nuances may differ). We conclude then that the two LFs of futures in both languages are the same, and that the difference in (otherwise unmarked) Mood values [±M] combined with [-T] is nearly meaningless.…”
Section: The Role and Distribution Of The Feature Perfectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer is because this V have must occur with a participle with the separate morphology of -en, a morpheme which when active spells out Past, i.e. [+T]; for arguments to this effect, see Emonds (2012 Realis future with going to are close to synonymous; it is next to impossible to find contexts where one is well-formed and/or appropriate and the other is clearly not (though nuances may differ). We conclude then that the two LFs of futures in both languages are the same, and that the difference in (otherwise unmarked) Mood values [±M] combined with [-T] is nearly meaningless.…”
Section: The Role and Distribution Of The Feature Perfectmentioning
confidence: 99%