2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Single Sex Debate for Girls in Science: a Comparison Between Two Informal Science Programs on Middle School Students’ STEM Identity Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
108
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
108
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For the analysis of student grade level, three studies were excluded due to overlapping grade levels (Heaverlo, 2011;Hughes et al, 2013;Innes et al, 2012). The effect sizes from grades 6-8, and 9-12 were statistically significantly different from zero; however, the effect sizes for K-5 were not.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the analysis of student grade level, three studies were excluded due to overlapping grade levels (Heaverlo, 2011;Hughes et al, 2013;Innes et al, 2012). The effect sizes from grades 6-8, and 9-12 were statistically significantly different from zero; however, the effect sizes for K-5 were not.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kessels and Hannover (2008) reported higher physics-related self-confidence amongst girls from single-sex physics classes than those from coeducational classes. However, the issue of single-sex versus coeducational schools, in relation to their impacts on girls' STEM identify formation, continues to be debated (Hughes et al 2013, Sills 2012. The majority of the participants in this study were in favour of mixed education, while being fully aware of the dangers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middle school girls' interests in science and their science identity improved as they interacted with positive STEM role models (Hughes, Nzekwe, & Molyneaux, 2013). Understanding that scientists can be diverse is important for the development of science identity, as well as encouraging students to consciously reflect on how they connect to scientists and to the topic of science.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%