2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1709.09957
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The singular set of minimal surfaces near polyhedral cones

Abstract: We adapt the method of Simon [25] to prove a C 1,α -regularity theorem for minimal varifolds which resemble a cone C 2 0 over an equiangular geodesic net. For varifold classes admitting a "no-hole" condition on the singular set, we additionally establish C 1,α -regularity near the cone C 2 0 × R m . Combined with work of Allard [3], Simon [25], Taylor [26],, our result implies a C 1,α -structure for the top three strata of minimizing clusters and size-minimizing currents, and a Lipschitz structure on the (n −… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also suspect that in light of the present work, extensions of [CES17] to more general polyhedral cones, allowing for certain 4-way and 5-way junctions, is possible in the codimension one stable setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also suspect that in light of the present work, extensions of [CES17] to more general polyhedral cones, allowing for certain 4-way and 5-way junctions, is possible in the codimension one stable setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Arguably more important than the final results of [Sim93] are the ideas used; the ideas developed by L. Simon, in particular the dichotomy in [Sim93, Lemma 2.1], have been further developed in recent years. Key examples of this include [CES17], [BK17], [Wic14a], [BW18], [BW19]. In all of these cases in order to prove the ǫ-regularity result it is necessary to deal with the possibility of density gaps, or if possible rule them out a priori.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pick J so that γ + J = 1, and recall that 1 + β ∈ (γ + J , γ + J+1 ). By assumption, we have sptM ∩ B 1/2 = graph U ⊂a+q(C) (u), where u satisfies the estimates (6). Since we are concerned with M ∩ B 1/4 , ensuring δ 2 (C) is small, there is no loss in assuming (after scaling, translating, rotating) that sptM = graph C 1 (u).…”
Section: Corollaries Related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain particular cases one can use the topology of M to deduce singular structure on M i . For example, when M is a union of halfplanes, then [10] showed that M i ∩ B 1/2 are a C 1,α perturbation of the M. Similar results hold if M has tetrahedral singularities, and the M i have an associated "orientation structure" ( [6]); or when M is a union of two planes, and the M i are 2-valued graphs ( [3]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One such instance directly relevant to the present work is [Wic14, Sections 10-14] where a degenerate situation in considered, in which the base cone C 0 is a higher-multiplicity hyperplane; the analysis done in [Wic14] in this case leads to Theorem 2.1 below which plays an essential role in our proof of Theorem A. See also: [Min21b] which studies a situation where branch points of the nearby varifolds do exist away from the axis of C 0 ; [BK17] where the "no significant gaps" condition used in [Sim93] fails (see the proof of Theorem C above); [CES17] where the (multiplicity 1) base cone C 0 is singular away from its spine; and [KW13], [KW17], [KW21] where the "cone" C 0 is the graph (possibly with multiplicity > 1) of a multi-valued homogeneous harmonic function ϕ, with varying degrees of homogeneity, including degrees of homogeneity < 1.…”
Section: Theorem B (Sheeting Theorem (Theorem 33 [Wic14])mentioning
confidence: 99%