The sino-singapore tianjin eco-city: A case study of Chinese experimental regulatory and institutional development

Abstract

The Sino-Singapore Tianjin Ecocity (SSTEC) is a large-scale pilot project, trialling innovative approaches in sustainable urban development. To implement its objectives, the SSTEC has been developed as a central element in a matrix of networked institutional relationships. This paper examines the functioning of these institutional interactions, through examination of the development of renewable energy-related initiatives. The salient elements of these interactions relate to consultation and information flows. This is intended to facilitate an empirically based experimental approach to project planning, implementation and review, in terms of the integration of research and implementation experience. Institutional and regulatory development at the SSTEC is evaluated in the context of other Chinese lowcarbon cities and other localised initiatives such as Green Counties and New Energy Demonstration Cities. This evaluation draws on interviews with senior staff members at the SSTEC, and in specialist Chinese renewable energy institutions, as well as scholarly and other literature. While substantial implementation challenges face the SSTEC and other large-scale projects, they are likely to play an instrumental role in scaling-up technologically and financially effective low-carbon solutions in Chinese urban development. Some inefficiencies and failures are to be expected in any experimental approach. These can be put to effective use through an empirical approach to determining best institutional and regulatory practice, in terms of realising China's low-carbon model of sustainable urban development.

Citizen Perspective on the Development of Sustainability Indicators—A Case Study based on the West Bund, Shanghai

“…The Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city, a typical example of urban SI development in China, is applied to reflect the above pros and cons. As a spectacular success, the Tianjin Eco-city has been praised for the superiority of its cross-border cooperation, the applicability of the indicators (Geroe, 2017;Liu et al, 2018;Zhan et al, 2018), and most importantly, the "replicable" and "scalable" standards for other urban practices (Joss, 2015, p. 220). Even though, the study (Li et al, 2019b, p. 67) criticised its use of "carbon emissions per unit GDP" as an indicator for reflecting a false premise that "you can continue to pollute if it creates enough growth".…”

Application and Multi-dimensional Thinking of the 5R Principles in Green Eco-city Construction

“…These measures comply with the 5R principles like Reduce, Reuse and Recycle. The Tianjin Eco-city adopts the three-level housing model of "eco-community-ecological zone", which sufficiently considers the bearing capacity of resources and environment, focuses on the development of green industries with low energy consumption, no pollution, and high added value, uses renewable energy (solar energy, geothermal energy, wind energy, and biomass energy) in multiple sources, and promotes waste separation and resource utilization (Geroe, 2017). Reduce, Reuse and Recycle principles were fully applied in constructing this eco-city.…”