1972
DOI: 10.1068/p010111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Site of Size Constancy

Abstract: Under appropriate conditions, with good depth cues, the perception of the bar width or spatial frequency of a pattern of black and white stripes (a grating) shows excellent size constancy. Two gratings at different distances look similar in spatial frequency when the actual width, not the angular width, of their stripes is the same. Adaptation to a high-contrast grating causes a rise in the threshold contrast for detecting gratings of similar orientation and spatial frequency. This aftereffect transfers from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that visual inferences of material properties are more likely to be based on estimated material spatial frequencies than on retinal frequencies. This finding is in accordance with data from experiments investigating spatial-frequency discrimination (Burbeck, 1987), spatial frequency memory masking (Bennett & Cortese, 1996), size constancy (Blakemore, Garner, & Sweet, 1972), recognition memory for shapes (Milliken & Jolicoeur, 1992), and for the extraction of upper case letters from noise (Parish & Sperling, 1991). It also seems to be in line with our everyday experience where material properties do not change massively with viewing distance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This suggests that visual inferences of material properties are more likely to be based on estimated material spatial frequencies than on retinal frequencies. This finding is in accordance with data from experiments investigating spatial-frequency discrimination (Burbeck, 1987), spatial frequency memory masking (Bennett & Cortese, 1996), size constancy (Blakemore, Garner, & Sweet, 1972), recognition memory for shapes (Milliken & Jolicoeur, 1992), and for the extraction of upper case letters from noise (Parish & Sperling, 1991). It also seems to be in line with our everyday experience where material properties do not change massively with viewing distance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…But this argument cannot explain the periodic function measured with a grating as the test target, nor the uniform effect after monocular adaptation (Fig. 6), and, in any case, Blakemore, Garner and Sweet (1972) have found that size constancy does not operate before the site of the threshold elevation.…”
Section: Disparity Detection In Manmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…It is perhaps the most primitive process shown so far to do so. 1 Spatial frequency coding, for example, is based upon retinal, rather than distal, spatial frequency as shown by the failure of adaptation to a specific spatial frequency to generalize to the same gratings presented at different distances (Blakemore, Garner, & Sweet, 1972). Recognition of a configuration seems, however, to depend at least approximately on size ratios within the figure and to be indifferent to its absolute size (Sutherland, 1968).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%