1982
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(82)90089-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The size of cooperatively rearranging regions at the glass transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
424
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 578 publications
(445 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
19
424
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of CRR obtained for PVAc at T g , ξ ≈ 1.7nm agrees almost quantitatively with the characteristic length scale obtained by Berthier et al [5] by means of multipoint dynamical susceptibility (ξ ≈ 2nm). The size of CRR obtained by us for PS is also in qualitative agreement with that estimated by Hempel et al [29] in the framework of Donth approach [2] (ξ ≈ 2.2nm vs. ξ ≈ 3nm) and in excellent agreement with that estimated by Sills et al [30] by means of nanoscale sliding friction (ξ ≈ 2.1nm). Our results are also compatible with the absence of finite size effects in confinement down to 5 nm [31].…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of CRR obtained for PVAc at T g , ξ ≈ 1.7nm agrees almost quantitatively with the characteristic length scale obtained by Berthier et al [5] by means of multipoint dynamical susceptibility (ξ ≈ 2nm). The size of CRR obtained by us for PS is also in qualitative agreement with that estimated by Hempel et al [29] in the framework of Donth approach [2] (ξ ≈ 2.2nm vs. ξ ≈ 3nm) and in excellent agreement with that estimated by Sills et al [30] by means of nanoscale sliding friction (ξ ≈ 2.1nm). Our results are also compatible with the absence of finite size effects in confinement down to 5 nm [31].…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this framework, more than forty years ago Adam and Gibbs [1] theorized that such a pronounced temperature dependence of the structural correlation time is due to a cooperative process involving several basic structural units forming cooperatively rearranging regions (CRR), which size increases with decreasing temperature. Since then a great deal of theoretical approaches [2,3] as well as simulation studies [4] and very recently experimental studies employing multipoint dynamical susceptibilities [5] have been devoted in the search of good candidates for CRR as well as its size and temperature dependence. All of these studies suggest that a growing correlation length with decreasing temperature of the order of several nanometers exists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Adam and Hibbs 22 introduced the concept of cooperative rearrangement of regions to unify these two views of glass transition. Donth 23 estimated the size of such cooperatively rearranging regions to be of the order of 10 Å for a number of glasses. When Se is confined between As 2 S 3 and the thickness of Se is comparable with the cooperative rearranging regions, it is possible to observe the quantum size effects on the glass transition temperature of Se.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general this is expected to have higher values for fragile glassformers because of their larger dynamical heterogeneity. This corresponds to larger CRRs for the soft glass, with widely distributed characteristic energy/time scales manifesting e.g., in non-Debyeian relaxation, in dielectric spectral hole burning, and in multi-dimensional NMR 26,27) Assuming the CRRs in the glass to have enough number of "particles" (N CRR , of heat capacity c each) for applying thermodynamic concepts, their mean temperature fluctuation is 28) δT 2 = k B T 2 /cN CRR . For T = T g this fluctuation is given by the half-width of the glass transition interval.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%