2020
DOI: 10.1080/1057610x.2020.1711605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Size of Terror Organizations: Poverty and Economic Inequality as Mobilizing Forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a battery of estimators, they find that higher levels of income inequality are associated with more domestic terrorism. Goldman and Noy (2020) uncover the relationship between poverty, economic inequality, and the joining of terror organizations. Using binary logistic regressions, they find no significant and robust relationship between poverty, economic inequality, and the number of people who joined the terror groups.…”
Section: Related Empirical Applications In the Relationship Between Inequality And Terrorismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using a battery of estimators, they find that higher levels of income inequality are associated with more domestic terrorism. Goldman and Noy (2020) uncover the relationship between poverty, economic inequality, and the joining of terror organizations. Using binary logistic regressions, they find no significant and robust relationship between poverty, economic inequality, and the number of people who joined the terror groups.…”
Section: Related Empirical Applications In the Relationship Between Inequality And Terrorismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the empirical validation between inequality and terrorism appears to be sparse to date. To the best of our knowledge, the few documented attempts include studies such as Piazza (2006), Derin‐Gure and Elveren (2014), Krieger and Meierrieks (2019), and Goldman and Noy (2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Linkage Between Inequality and Terrorismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation