2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.01897
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The size-Ramsey number of cubic graphs

Abstract: We show that the size-Ramsey number of any cubic graph with n vertices is Opn 8{5 q, improving a bound of n 5{3`op1q due to Kohayakawa, Rödl, Schacht, and Szemerédi. The heart of the argument is to show that there is a constant C such that a random graph with Cn vertices where every edge is chosen independently with probability p ě Cn ´2{5 is with high probability Ramsey for any cubic graph with n vertices. This latter result is best possible up to the constant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…n ˆ?n grid, an important result of Kohayakawa, Rödl, Szemerédi, and Schacht [17], which says that every graph H with n vertices and maximum degree ∆ satisfies rpHq ď n 2´1{∆`op1q , immediately yields the bound n 7{4`op1q . This was recently improved by Clemens, Miralaei, Reding, Schacht, and Taraz [6] to n 3{2`op1q (and an alternative proof of this bound was also noted in our recent paper [7]). The goal of this short note is to provide an elementary proof of an improved upper bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…n ˆ?n grid, an important result of Kohayakawa, Rödl, Szemerédi, and Schacht [17], which says that every graph H with n vertices and maximum degree ∆ satisfies rpHq ď n 2´1{∆`op1q , immediately yields the bound n 7{4`op1q . This was recently improved by Clemens, Miralaei, Reding, Schacht, and Taraz [6] to n 3{2`op1q (and an alternative proof of this bound was also noted in our recent paper [7]). The goal of this short note is to provide an elementary proof of an improved upper bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The fourth question, about the size Ramsey number of paths, was resolved by Beck [2], who proved the surprising result that r(P n ) = Θ(n) for the path P n with n vertices. This breakthrough inspired many of the subsequent developments in the field, such as the classic papers [3,17,20,23,28] and the more recent results in [4,5,6,12,13,14,18,19,22,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%